Tag Archives: Speculation

Some Prophetic Speculations

Alan Feuerbacher

1831: William Miller begins preaching Christ’s return in the fall of 1843.

1842: Miller and followers begin publishing a journal, The Midnight Cry.

1843, late: Miller and followers disappointed; fix Christ’s return in the spring of 1844.

1844, spring: Miller and followers disappointed; fix Christ’s return on October 22, 1844.

1844, late: Miller and followers anticipate disappointment.

1844, October 21: Miller says: “I told some of my brethren Christ would not come on the morrow” because the Second Coming would be “in an hour they think not”. He was not responsible for the deception: “No one can honestly say that he has been deceived by me. My advice has always been for each to study the evidence of his faith for himself.” God may have designed the delay so that people would turn to the Bible to study further and be reconciled to God. After all, to have erred in the precise date did not reduce the urgency of the times. Every passing day was one day nearer the end.

1844, November 10: Miller safely revises the date and overcomes all possibility of disappointment: “I have fixed my mind upon another time, and here I mean to stand until God gives me more light. — And that is Today, TODAY, and TODAY, until He comes.”

1845: Miller admits his mistake: “That I have been mistaken in the time, I freely confess; and I have no desire to defend my course any further than I have been actuated by pure motives, and it has resulted in God’s glory. My mistakes and errors God, I trust, will forgive.”

1845: George Storrs, one of Miller’s leading followers, declares that God had not been in the “definite time” movement, that they had been “mesmereized” by mere human influence, and that “the Bible did not teach definite time at all.”

1840s, late: Seventh Day Adventists, Second Adventists, and many other groups form from splinters of Miller’s movement, carrying on with new prophetic speculations. Some decide that Miller had been right after all, that Miller had “expected the wrong thing at the right time”.

1860: Nelson H. Barbour discovers that certain chronological calculations show 6,000 years of human history ending in 1873; he begins preaching that the Second Coming of the Lord would be in 1873.

1869: Barbour publishes 1st edition of the pamphlet Evidences for the Coming of the Lord in 1873; or the Midnight Cry.

1871: Barbour publishes 2nd edition of Evidences.

1873: Barbour begins publishing a monthly journal, The Midnight Cry, and Herald of the Morning.

1873, late: Barbour revises his prediction to autumn, 1874; ceases publication of The Midnight Cry, and Herald of the Morning.

1875: Barbour and followers decide that Christ had returned invisibly in 1874, that they had merely “expected the wrong thing at the right time”; in June Barbour restarts his journal as Herald of the Morning and lays the foundation for further predictions; in the September issue he makes a prediction that “the Gentile times” would end in 1914; in later issues he expands on this theme.

1870s: Charles Taze Russell forms Bible study classes, adopts many teachings from former Millerites including George Storrs, and various prophetic speculators

1876, January: Russell reads Barbour’s magazine, invites him to teach him all about Bible chronology.

1876, early: Russell convinces Barbour to cease publication of Herald of the Morning so that they can work on a book that would be a compilation of articles that would otherwise have been published in Barbour’s magazine.

1876, late: in the October issue of George Storrs’ periodical The Bible Examiner Russell restates Barbour’s prediction that “the Gentile times” will end in 1914.

1877: Russell and Barbour publish the book Three Worlds, and the Harvest of This World, predict that “the saints” would be resurrected in 1878 and teach that “the parable of the Ten Virgins” began to be fulfilled in 1844 by Miller’s followers; Russell publishes his booklet Object and Manner of Our Lord’s Return.

1878: Russell and Barbour restart publication of Herald of the Morning; “the saints” do not appear and so Russell spiritualizes their “resurrection”, saying that it had indeed occurred but invisibly, and that he had been expecting “the wrong thing at the right time”, just as Christ had invisibly returned in 1874; Russell and Barbour disagree on whether “the saints” had been resurrected, and this creates the first major disagreement between them.

1879: Russell and Barbour split company; in July Russell begins publishing his own journal, Zion’s Watch Tower and Herald of Christ’s Presence; Russell continues to proclaim that Christ had returned in 1874 and that “the Gentile Times” would end in 1914; Russell reaffirms his teaching that Miller’s movement in 1844 began the “modern day” fulfillment of end-times prophecies.

1880, late and early 1881: Russell predicts another earthly “resurrection of the saints” in October, 1881.

1881, late: Russell spiritualizes the October “resurrection”, saying that it closed a period of “the high calling”.

1880s: Russell refines beliefs, including exactly what would happen in 1914.

1889: Russell publishes volume 2 of The Millennial DawnThe Time Is At Hand; predicts that by 1914 “the Kingdom of God” will have obtained full control in heaven and on earth, that Christ would be reigning visibly, that “the saints” would all be resurrected, that the city of Jerusalem would be highly honored again, that “the Battle of Armageddon” (which had begun in 1878) would have culminated in worldwide anarchy and given way to “new heavens and new earth” with peaceful blessings, and that “God’s Kingdom” would be “in the earth and then smite and crush the Gentile image” and would “fully consume the power of these kings”.

1904: Russell decides that 1914 was not necessarily the proper date for “the Gentile times” to end after all, that perhaps it would be 1915 and that other things he had predicted might turn out rather differently.

1914, early: Russell waffles about the certainty of his dating scheme, wonders if he had been “expecting the wrong thing at the right time”.

1914, late: Russell and followers decide that the outbreak of “the Great War” is a fulfillment of Russell’s predictions and that the war would culminate in the Battle of Armageddon.

1916: Russell writes that some of his predictions had indeed not been fulfilled, but much like William Miller did, that they “certainly did have a very stimulating and sanctifying effect upon thousands, all of whom accordingly can praise the Lord — even for the mistake. Many, indeed, can express themselves as being thankful to the Lord that the culmination of the Church’s hopes was not reached at the time we expected; and that we, as the Lord’s people, have further opportunities of perfecting holiness and of being participators with our Master in the further presentation of His Message to His people.”

1917: The book The Finished Mystery predicts that the War would soon end in the Battle of Armageddon.

1918: The Watchtower Society begins delivering public lectures titled “Millions Now Living May Never Die” which were quickly changed to “Millions Now Living Will Never Die”.

1920: In the booklet “Millions Now Living Will Never Die” the WTS begins predicting that 1925 would see the resurrection of the faithful prophets of old and the beginning of the Battle of Armageddon.

1925: Armageddon does not come.

1920s, late: The Bible Students lose 3/4 of their membership; those who remain begin to forget about 1925.

1940: The Watchtower informs the public that Armageddon is only months away.

1942: After J. F. Rutherford’s death Nathan Knorr announces that the end of the War would not see the Battle of Armageddon after all, but that it would soon follow.

1950s: The Society tells its followers to expect Armageddon very soon.

1961: In the book Let Your Name Be Sanctified Fred Franz tells JWs that in 1942, when upon his deathbed Rutherford appointed Franz and Knorr to head up the Society, the “Elijah” work was finished and the “Elishah” began. This work, he wrote, began in the 1870s with Russell. Putting this together with Russell’s teachings on “the Ten Virgins”, it would seem that William Miller really began this modern-day Elijah work and is the spiritual father of Jehovah’s Witnesses. Of course, Miller has many other “daughters”.

1966: In the book Life Everlasting in the Freedom of the Sons of God Fred Franz tells JWs that 6,000 years of human history would be finished in 1975 and that it was a good bet that Armageddon would come by then.

1967: The Society instructs District Overseers to deliver speeches at circuit assemblies announcing that Armageddon would definitely have arrived by 1975.

1968: The Society institutes a six-month Bible Study campaign in anticipation of the great influx of new converts in the few years before Armageddon.

1960s, late, through early 1970s: JWs inform the world that it is extremely likely that Armageddon will come by 1975.

1975: The Society informs its followers that Armageddon did not arrive.

1976: Fred Franz blames the JW community: “it didn’t come because YOU were expecting it”. The Watchtower blames the JW community for being disappointed by listening to it.

1970s, late: Many JWs abandon ship.

1980: The Society admits to having had some share in the disappointment.

1980s: The JW community and WTS leaders forget about 1975; some expect Armageddon in 1984 or 1994 based on the time for 70 or 80 years for a generation from 1914 to expire; a small number of WTS publications hint or state outright that “it will all be over” by the year 2000.

1990s: Many JWs quietly expect “the end” by 2000; the WTS keeps up their expectations with general statements of “real soon now”.

1995: The WTS changes its teaching on “the generation” but keeps up with the “Real Soon Now” theme.

The above brief chronology documents some 170 years of “crying wolf” by prophetic speculators. Not a single prediction has ever come true. Contrast this with what happened when God spoke through Moses — “it all came true.” (Joshua 21:45)

Even if some of the predictions of today’s prophetic speculators should come true, it would be purely by accident, just as when the wolf came after the boy had “cried wolf” every day for years. It would be no credit to the boy.

In fact, because Jesus said that “at an hour that you do not think to be it, the Son of man is coming”, anyone who correctly “predicts” the time of his coming cannot be his follower. Conversely, no one who is Jesus’ true follower would presume to make such predictions.

William Miller ultimately learned the proper attitude the hard way: “I have fixed my mind upon another time, and here I mean to stand until God gives me more light. — And that is Today, TODAY, and TODAY, until He comes.”

The Babylonian Exile Shaped the Future [of Prophetic Speculation] – Doug Mason

Doug Mason has favored us again with another of his very detailed and scholarly studies of subjects related to chronological speculation. (Click here.) We have always found these studies informative and useful for any serious student of the Bible, history, prophecy, chronology and eschatology. These are not studies that push a particular religious agenda. Doug Mason’s knowledge of the specific issues and concerns of Jehovah’s Witnesses make his writing very relevant for this site.

This latest article he has contributed, “The Babylonian Exile Shaped the Future,” is 107 pages long, and available in PDF.

The following is a high level summary of the content and theme as given by Doug Mason:

The theme of the attached Study is simple:
  1. The Hebrews considered themselves to be “God’s Chosen People”, yet Israel had been dispersed by the Assyrians and Judah was dominated by Egypt and then by Babylon.
  2. In response to Judah’s captivity, its prophets promised the nation that God would restore them to their rightful position and that God would forever maintain the throne of David.
  3. When exiles returned from Babylon, they set about creating a nation that was faithful to God.
  4. Centuries passed but the Hebrews remained oppressed by successive Gentile powers. In response, the Jews anticipated imminent divine intervention.
  5. Followers of Jesus Christ applied the prophets’ promises to their leaders and to themselves, anticipating an imminent divine intervention.
  6. In every succeeding century, people kept expecting divine intervention during their life.

One of the images that shows the scope of the study is included below:

scopemason

And lastly, just to give a preview, the Table of Contents is included (in spite of the fact that it will not be formatted correctly):

  • Outline and Summary …………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 4
  • Contents ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 6
  • Table of Figures ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 14
  • References cited in this Study ………………………………………………………………………………………………… 16
  • Recommended further reading ……………………………………………………………………………………………….. 18 I. PROMISES TO THE EXILES ……………………………………………………………………………………….. 19
  • THE EXILES ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 20
  • Little documented evidence of the exilic period ………………………………………………………………… 20
  • Exiles mostly came from Jerusalem and its environs …………………………………………………………. 20
  • Exiles permitted to settle in their own groups ……………………………………………………………………. 21
  • The religion of the Exiled Jews……………………………………………………………………………………….. 22
  • The exiled Jews had to reformulate themselves …………………………………………………………………. 22
  • Expressed with sad literature their longing for home …………………………………………………………. 23
  • Babylon appointed a local as Governor of Judah ……………………………………………………………….. 23
  • Babylonians comprehended Israelite practice ……………………………………………………………………. 23
  • Worship by the Exiles in Egypt ………………………………………………………………………………………. 23
  • JEREMIAH …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 23
  • Jeremiah, a tortured soul ………………………………………………………………………………………………… 23
  • Jeremiah’s promises to the exiles …………………………………………………………………………………….. 24
  • Foreigners will no longer enslave them ………………………………………………………………………… 24
  • The LORD will heal them and restore them ………………………………………………………………….. 24
  • God promised to enter into a new agreement with them …………………………………………………. 24
  • David will always have a man on the throne of Israel …………………………………………………….. 25
  • The composition of the book of Jeremiah is an untraceable complex process ……………………….. 25
  • The Hebrew and Greek texts of Jeremiah differ significantly ……………………………………………… 25
  • EZEKIEL ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 25
  • Ezekiel and Jeremiah were of a different order of priests ……………………………………………………. 25
  • Older generations blamed for their situation ……………………………………………………………………… 25
  • Ezekiel’s covenant promises: Restoration of the nation and of the throne …………………………….. 26
  • ISAIAH CHAPTERS 40 TO 66 …………………………………………………………………………………………. 26
  • The sixth-century setting of Isaiah 40-66 …………………………………………………………………………. 26
  • Deutero-Isaiah’s promises to the Exiles ……………………………………………………………………………. 27
  • Monotheistic statements located at the early part of “Deutero-Isaiah” ………………………………….. 27
  • DEUTERONOMIC HISTORY ………………………………………………………………………………………….. 28
  • The Sources …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 28
  • Deuteronomy provides the key ……………………………………………………………………………………….. 28
  • 7
  • Discovery of Deuteronomy …………………………………………………………………………………………….. 28
  • The Deuteronomists’ History ………………………………………………………………………………………….. 29
  • The Deuteronomic Historian …………………………………………………………………………………………… 29
  • Israel’s history was reshaped in Babylon ………………………………………………………………………….. 30
  • Subsequent redactions ……………………………………………………………………………………………………. 30 II. PROMISES PRODUCED POST-EXILIC ACTION …………………………………………………………. 31
  • THE FALL OF BABYLON ………………………………………………………………………………………………. 32
  • The 50 years of exile had been an age of mysteries ……………………………………………………………. 33
  • Decree by Cyrus ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 33
  • SOME EXILES RETURN …………………………………………………………………………………………………. 33
  • Returnees led by Sheshbazzar and Zerubbabel ………………………………………………………………….. 33
  • Social Stratification ……………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 33
  • Conflict in the Postexilic Community ………………………………………………………………………………. 34
  • Little clarity in the record of the Persian period ………………………………………………………………… 34
  • Archaeological material not reliable for the period ……………………………………………………………. 35
  • Subsistence farming continued during the Persian period …………………………………………………… 35
  • Persian strategy …………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 35
  • Emphases of the Biblical texts from the Persian period ……………………………………………………… 35
  • RESURGENCE OF THE PRIESTLY CLASS …………………………………………………………………….. 36
  • Success of the Aaronid priesthood …………………………………………………………………………………… 36
  • Religion’s attempt at continuity with the past……………………………………………………………………. 36
  • The Priesthood ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 37
  • The Temple …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 37
  • WRITINGS WERE COMPOSED DURING AND AFTER THE EXILE ………………………………… 37
  • EZRA AND NEHEMIAH …………………………………………………………………………………………………. 38
  • Two phases of attempted restoration ……………………………………………………………………………….. 38
  • Ezra arrived with two important documents ……………………………………………………………………… 38
  • Ezra the lawgiver ………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 38
  • Ezra, architect of Israel’s new identity ……………………………………………………………………………… 38
  • The book of Ezra …………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 39
  • Theme of Ezra-Nehemiah ………………………………………………………………………………………………. 39
  • Ezra influential in the redaction process …………………………………………………………………………… 40
  • Nehemiah, visionary and a man of action …………………………………………………………………………. 40
  • Nehemiah repaired the walls of Jerusalem………………………………………………………………………… 41
  • Dedication of the new walls marked the end of the Exile ……………………………………………………. 41
  • CHRONICLES ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 41
  • Two Histories: Kings (part of the “Deuteronomic History”) and Chronicles …………………………. 41
  • Chronicles: Date ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 41
  • Chronicles: Style …………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 42
  • 8
  • Chronicles: Is not literal history ………………………………………………………………………………………. 42
  • Chronicles: Is theological history ……………………………………………………………………………………. 42
  • POST-EXILIC PSALMS …………………………………………………………………………………………………… 43 III. UNFULFILLED PROMISES PRODUCED CHANGE ………………………………………………….. 44
  • ROOTS OF APOCALYPTICISM ………………………………………………………………………………………. 45
  • Failure of Ezekiel’s promise of national resurrection …………………………………………………………. 45
  • Prophecy declined and apocalyptic speculation grew …………………………………………………………. 45
  • Postexilic writings are proto-apocalyptic ………………………………………………………………………….. 45
  • Apocalypticism’s indebtedness to ancient Near Eastern myths and Hebrew prophecy ……………. 45
  • Apocalypticism not the exclusive property of any one sect or movement ……………………………… 46
  • Apocalyptic writings do not reflects the viewpoint of established power ……………………………… 46
  • First major cluster of Jewish apocalyptic writings are about the time of the Maccabean revolt .. 46
  • Cluster of eschatological prophets …………………………………………………………………………………… 46
  • Jubilees ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 47
  • 1 and 2 Maccabees record the Antiochene crisis ……………………………………………………………….. 47
  • 1 Maccabees shows that Daniel 9 had Antiochus IV in mind ………………………………………………. 47
  • The Testaments …………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 47
  • 1 Enoch ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 48
  • First Book of Enoch may be the starting point of apocalypticism ………………………………………… 48
  • Apocalyptic texts were the alchemist’s crucible ………………………………………………………………… 49
  • Unfulfilled prophecy appears to be a major defect of apocalyptic works ………………………………. 49
  • The most influential passage in Jewish apocalyptic literature ……………………………………………… 49
  • ASSIMILATION WITH HELLENISTIC WORLD LED TO THE MACCABEAN REVOLT …… 50
  • The Maccabees/Hasmoneans: History & Overview (166 – 129 BCE) …………………………………… 50
  • The contemporary Maccabean/Hasmonean history ……………………………………………………………. 50
  • The Jewish Hammer ………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 51
  • Jews Regain Their Independence …………………………………………………………………………………. 51
  • The words “Maccabee” and “Hasmonean” ……………………………………………………………………….. 52
  • THE BOOK OF DANIEL …………………………………………………………………………………………………. 52
  • The plot of the book of Daniel ………………………………………………………………………………………… 52
  • Daniel is a composite book …………………………………………………………………………………………….. 52
  • Versions of the Book of Daniel ……………………………………………………………………………………….. 52
  • Less stable and diverse redaction, editing, and transmission of Ezekiel, Jeremiah, and Daniel … 53
  • The Jews place the book of Daniel in the Writings ……………………………………………………………. 53
  • The author of Daniel drew from the surrounding cultures …………………………………………………… 53
  • The book of Daniel is Hellenistic ……………………………………………………………………………………. 53
  • Daniel reflects the Hellenistic belief in an afterlife ……………………………………………………………. 53
  • DANIEL COMPOSED IN THE SECOND CENTURY BCE ………………………………………………… 54
  • Daniel is a historical book written around 167-165 BCE ……………………………………………………… 54
  • 9
  • Stories of Daniel and the visions collected during the 2nd century BCE ………………………………… 54
  • Daniel written in response to a religious and political threat in the 2nd century BCE ………………. 54
  • Daniel’s interest in the Seleucid Kingdom………………………………………………………………………… 55
  • Enoch and Daniel arise out of crises created by Hellenism and Antiochus Epiphanes ……………. 55
  • Daniel completed shortly before the death of Antiochus …………………………………………………….. 55
  • Most scholars assign the final form of Daniel 7-12 to the Antiochene period ………………………… 55
  • The “Daniel” seems to have lived in the second century BCE ……………………………………………… 55
  • Development of the idea that Daniel related to the second century BCE ……………………………….. 55
  • HISTORICAL ACCURACIES AND INACCURACIES OF DANIEL……………………………………. 56
  • The Book of Daniel is not meant as literal history……………………………………………………………… 56
  • Nothing is known historically of a Daniel in Babylon ………………………………………………………… 56
  • Jerusalem fell to Nebuchadnezzar for the first time in 597 BCE …………………………………………… 56
  • Some of the historical errors in Daniel …………………………………………………………………………….. 56
  • Historical accuracies and inaccuracies date the completion of the book of Daniel …………………. 57
  • The writer lived long after the events, and made mistakes ………………………………………………….. 57
  • No place in history for “Darius the Mede” ……………………………………………………………………….. 57
  • Daniel records Alexander, the Ptolemies and the Seleucids ………………………………………………… 58
  • RELIGIOUS PURPOSE OF THE BOOK OF DANIEL ………………………………………………………… 58
  • The author of Daniel is preoccupied with cultic issues ……………………………………………………….. 58
  • The stories prove that God is great ………………………………………………………………………………….. 59
  • Stories illustrate an attitude about living as a Jew ……………………………………………………………… 59
  • The fanciful narratives provide instruction for living in the Diaspora …………………………………… 59
  • They endure martyrdom to purify themselves for union with God and his angels ………………….. 60
  • DANIEL PROVIDES ESOTERIC EXPLANATIONS ………………………………………………………….. 60
  • The four kingdoms of Daniel ………………………………………………………………………………………….. 60
  • Do not set dates today from the book of Daniel…………………………………………………………………. 60
  • THE LAST-DAY COMMUNITY AT QUMRAN ………………………………………………………………… 61
  • The authors of the DSS formed a sect ………………………………………………………………………………. 61
  • Qumran history ran from 150 BCE to 68 CE ………………………………………………………………………. 61
  • Two events might have impacted early Qumran history……………………………………………………… 61
  • Authors of the DSS were anti-Hasmonean ……………………………………………………………………….. 62
  • QUMRAN WRITINGS …………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 62
  • Scrolls, but no book or codex………………………………………………………………………………………….. 62
  • The Qumran community had no single, stable text …………………………………………………………….. 62
  • Various editions of several books ……………………………………………………………………………………. 63
  • Extreme fluidity of the DSS texts ……………………………………………………………………………………. 63
  • Assumed link between the DSS and the Masoretic Text contradicted by historical evidence ….. 63
  • The Masoretic Text is not the main witness to the Hebrew Bible ………………………………………… 63
  • A variety of sources used during the Second Temple period ……………………………………………….. 64
  • 10
  • There were collections of scripture but no fixed list (canon) ……………………………………………….. 64
  • Qumran had no list of sacred titles …………………………………………………………………………………… 65
  • The Temple Scroll and the Book of Jubilees were cited as authoritative ……………………………….. 65
  • QUMRAN EXPECTATIONS ……………………………………………………………………………………………. 65
  • Qumran considered themselves the restored Israel …………………………………………………………….. 65
  • Full restoration still hoped for …………………………………………………………………………………………. 66
  • The End of Days was imminent ………………………………………………………………………………………. 66
  • They expected Daniel’s visions would be fulfilled in their day ……………………………………………. 66
  • Qumran believed their times were the fulfilment of biblical predictions ………………………………. 67
  • Qumran anticipated the restoration of David’s throne ………………………………………………………… 67
  • They considered themselves the true Israel ………………………………………………………………………. 67
  • Qumran was the true Israel of the last days, receiving the new covenant ………………………………. 67
  • Actions taken at Qumran in preparation for the coming messianic age …………………………………. 67
  • THE QUMRAN COMMUNITY AND CHRISTIANITY ……………………………………………………… 67
  • Similarities of the Qumran community and Christianity …………………………………………………….. 67
  • The Dead Sea Scrolls and the origins of Christianity …………………………………………………………. 68
  • The DSS, the NT and apocalypticism ………………………………………………………………………………. 68
  • The DSS and the NT retell Israel’s story from an apocalyptic view ……………………………………… 68
  • Qumran and Christianity each believed they were the apocalyptic restored Israel ………………….. 68
  • DSS and the NT are reconstructions of Israel’s story …………………………………………………………. 69
  • Essene and Christian use of the Hebrew Scriptures ……………………………………………………………. 69
  • Real relationship of the DSS and the NT ………………………………………………………………………….. 69
  • John the Baptist might have been associated with the Qumran sect ……………………………………… 70
  • JEWISH MYSTICISM ……………………………………………………………………………………………………… 70
  • The four most well-known Jewish groups concurrent with Qumran …………………………………….. 70
  • Pharisees, Sadducees, Essenes, and Zealots………………………………………………………………………. 70
  • The religious movements cannot be understood independently of the others ………………………… 71
  • Expulsion practised at Qumran ……………………………………………………………………………………….. 71
  • Recording of history was not strong among those Jews ……………………………………………………… 72 IV. PROMISES EXTENDED TO THE GENTILES ……………………………………………………………. 73
  • JESUS (YESHUA) …………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 74
  • Daniel influenced Jesus ………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 74
  • The Gospel’s “little apocalypses” were a midrash on Daniel ………………………………………………. 74
  • Jesus reinterpreted Israel’s Scriptures ………………………………………………………………………………. 74
  • Jesus contradicted many of Qumran’s standards ……………………………………………………………….. 74
  • Jesus threatened the ideologies of the priestly establishment and groups like those at Qumran .. 75
  • Jesus’ call to be open to all nations ………………………………………………………………………………….. 75
  • Luke emphasised Jesus’ outreach beyond Judaism ……………………………………………………………. 75
  • The Temple was for “all nations” ……………………………………………………………………………………. 75
  • 11
  • Defining the New Community (Matthew 11-13) ……………………………………………………………….. 75
  • The reconstitution of God’s promise to his covenant people ……………………………………………….. 75
  • The inclusiveness of the community of faith …………………………………………………………………….. 76
  • PAUL …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 76
  • Paul, the single most important figure in spreading the movement ………………………………………. 76
  • Paul was not a disciple and he was at odds with the leaders of the primitive church ………………. 76
  • Paul was in common with Jews of the Diaspora ………………………………………………………………… 76
  • Paul was also influenced by Hellenistic thinking ………………………………………………………………. 76
  • Stoicism…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 77
  • Conscience ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 77
  • Paul focused his mission towards Gentiles and pagans ………………………………………………………. 77
  • Paul excused Gentile Christians from having to observe ceremonial and dietary Jewish laws …. 77
  • Jesus’ and Paul’s expectation of the Parousia removed; church hierarchy instituted ……………… 78
  • PAUL’S JESUS ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 78
  • Paul’s Jesus is different to the Gospel’s Jesus …………………………………………………………………… 78
  • The status of Christ in the Pauline religion ……………………………………………………………………….. 78
  • PAUL’S ESCHATOLOGY ……………………………………………………………………………………………….. 78
  • Paul’s “gathering” goes back to the OT gathering of the exiles …………………………………………… 78
  • Paul recalled the OT prophetic literature ………………………………………………………………………….. 79
  • Fulfillment of the eschatological promises made to Israel …………………………………………………… 79
  • Daniel influenced Paul …………………………………………………………………………………………………… 79
  • Apocalyptic eschatology means revealed eschatology ……………………………………………………….. 79
  • “Apocalyptic eschatology” can apply to Paul ……………………………………………………………………. 79
  • Paul’s imminent cosmic triumph of God ………………………………………………………………………….. 80
  • Paul: the present era nearly at its end and the return of Christ is imminent ……………………………. 80
  • Paul’s philadelphia (brotherly love) was an eschatological blessing ……………………………………. 80
  • PAUL’S CREATIVE MYTHOLOGIES ……………………………………………………………………………… 80
  • Paul turned baptism into a mythical re-enactment ……………………………………………………………… 80
  • Mythical meaning of the “Lord’s Supper” revealed to Paul by Christ, not from man ……………… 82
  • Paul was cautious about Charismatic manifestations ………………………………………………………….. 82
  • Paul’s fertile mind created an elaborate doctrinal construct ………………………………………………… 82
  • Paul’s part in the formation of Christianity……………………………………………………………………….. 83
  • PRIMITIVE CHRISTIANITY AND SCRIPTURE ………………………………………………………………. 83
  • Earliest Christians focused on a person, not on scripture ……………………………………………………. 83
  • NT writers sought prophecies about Jesus rather than in exegesis ……………………………………….. 83
  • NT writers saw continuity with the Hebrew Scriptures but not exact interpretations ……………… 83
  • Christians made highly selective use of the OT …………………………………………………………………. 83
  • The LXX was the Christians’ Bible …………………………………………………………………………………. 84
  • Paul cited the LXX rather than the MT, and he employed creative exegesis …………………………. 84
  • 12
  • The outward expression of Christianity changed ……………………………………………………………….. 84
  • “Original inspiration only” does not resolve the NT’s use of the Hebrew Scriptures ……………… 84
  • THE CHURCH DEPENDED ON ITS JEWISH APOCALYPTIC HERITAGE ……………………….. 84
  • The early church preserved a vast number of apocalyptic texts …………………………………………… 84
  • Primitive Christianity took root in Jewish apocalyptic literature ………………………………………….. 85
  • The debt of Christianity to its Jewish heritage, particularly its apocalyptic heritage ………………. 85
  • Jesus and the Gospel writers read Daniel typologically ………………………………………………………. 85
  • The OT, especially Daniel, permeates Revelation ……………………………………………………………… 85
  • Book of Daniel had the greatest influence on the book of Revelation …………………………………… 86
  • JUDAISM FOLLOWING THE DESTRUCTION OF JERUSALEM ……………………………………… 86
  • After the destruction of Jerusalem (70 CE), Judaism shifted from temple-based to text-based …. 86
  • The myth of Jamnia ………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 86
  • Second major cluster of Jewish apocalyptic writings …………………………………………………………. 87 V. PROMISES KEEP BEING REPEATED………………………………………………………………………. 88
  • IT IS HAZARDOUS TO ASSUME SCRIPTURE TALKS OF ONE’S OWN TIME ………………… 91
  • Hazardous to claim that the book of Daniel directly refers to events of one’s own day …………… 91
  • Pesher assumes, as with the Qumran community, that Scripture is talking of one’s own time …. 91
  • The visions were addressed to people who needed to hear them ………………………………………….. 91
  • Numerous expositors see prophecies fulfilled in their own time ………………………………………….. 91
  • Daniel influenced succeeding millennia …………………………………………………………………………… 92
  • Each new generation applied Revelation to their own generation ………………………………………… 92
  • Revelation is a “language arsenal” that has stirred dangerous men and women …………………….. 92
  • The predictions of Revelation did not come to pass …………………………………………………………… 92
  • The world had persistently refused to end ………………………………………………………………………… 92
  • EACH GENERATION APPLIES PROPHECIES TO ITS OWN TIME ………………………………….. 93
  • Jesus announced the end would be seen by his contemporaries …………………………………………… 93
  • The first Christians expected they would witness the end of the world …………………………………. 93
  • First century CE Jews applied Daniel to themselves ………………………………………………………….. 93
  • First century apocalypses influenced by Daniel 7 ………………………………………………………………. 93
  • Josephus believed Daniel was speaking of the Roman Empire ……………………………………………. 93
  • Various interpretations of Daniel’s “four kingdoms” …………………………………………………………. 93
  • Revelation influenced succeeding millennia ……………………………………………………………………… 94
  • Fourth century upsurge of interest in Revelation ……………………………………………………………….. 94
  • Three-and-a-half year period invoked throughout late antiquity and the Middle Ages ……………. 95
  • Eschatological expectation in the Medieval times ……………………………………………………………… 95
  • 14th century: Beguines saw the church as the Antichrist ……………………………………………………. 95
  • 15th and 16th century applications to their own day ………………………………………………………….. 95
  • 16th century: Martin Luther identified the Turks as the eschatological fourth beast……………….. 95
  • 16th century: John Knox applied Daniel to the Papacy ………………………………………………………. 96
  • 13
  • 16th century: Joseph Mede expected the end to come in 1716 or in 1736 …………………………….. 96
  • 17th century: Aspinall applied Daniel to his own times ……………………………………………………… 96
  • 17th century: Tillinghast predicted the end to come in 1656 ……………………………………………….. 96
  • Daniel chapters 2 and 7 stimulated centuries of missionary movements ……………………………….. 96
  • 17th century: The “Fifth Monarchy Men” were the saints of Daniel 7 ………………………………….. 97
  • 18th century: The First Great Awakening of the American revival ………………………………………. 97
  • 19th century: Leaders saw Daniel being fulfilled in their own day ………………………………………. 97
  • 19th century: William Miller expected the end around 1843 ……………………………………………….. 97
  • 19th century: Invention of the “Rapture” by Darby; followed by Scofield and Moody …………… 98
  • 19th century: Special hope offered for the Jewish people …………………………………………………… 98
  • 19th century: Numerous speculative commentaries …………………………………………………………… 99
  • 19th century: The Shakers; Latter-day Saints; Charles Taze Russell ……………………………………. 99
  • 19th century: Sandford; Purnell; Pentacostalism ……………………………………………………………….. 99
  • The Great War of 1914-1918 sparked apocalyptic speculation ………………………………………….. 100
  • 20th century: Explosive growth of interest in apocalyptic …………………………………………………. 100
  • 20th century: Christabel Pankhurst on the “promised return of Jesus Christ” ………………………. 100
  • 1917: Toppling of Russian Czar seen as fulfilment of Ezekiel’s prophecy ………………………….. 100
  • 20th century: Signs produced anticipation in Christian circles …………………………………………… 101
  • 20th century: The number 666 applied to a string of contemporary candidates ……………………. 101
  • 20th century: Reagan feared the number 666; current events fulfilled biblical prophecy ………. 101
  • 1967 Six-Day war and Jerusalem’s liberation hailed as “a forward leap” ……………………………. 101 BONUS: ISRAEL’S DESCENDANTS…………………………………………………………………………………. 102
  • London, cleansed by fire, would be the ‘New Jerusalem’ …………………………………………………. 104