Category Archives: Uncategorized

Carl Sagan’s Remarks About Jehovah’s Witnesses False Prophecies

Alan Feuerbacher

A few years after the complete collapse of everything C. T. Russell had predicted, J. F. Rutherford began a process of replacing Russell’s unfulfilled predictions with a series of invisible and spiritual events associated with the years 1914 and 1918. By the early 1930s the process was complete.

An interesting comment on this transformation was made by Carl Sagan in his book Broca’s Brain (New York: Ballantine Books, 1979, pp. 332-333):

Doctrines that make no predictions are less compelling than those which make correct predictions; they are in turn more successful than doctrines that make false predictions.

But not always. One prominent American religion confidently predicted that the world would end in 1914. Well, 1914 has come and gone, and — while the events of that year were certainly of some importance — the world does not, at least so far as I can see, seem to have ended. There are at least three responses that an organized religion can make in the face of such a failed and fundamental prophecy. They could have said, “Oh, did we say ‘1914’? So sorry, we meant ‘2014.’ A slight error in calculation. Hope you weren’t inconvenienced in any way.” But they did not. They could have said, “Well, the world would have ended, except we prayed very hard and interceded with God so He spared the Earth.” But they did not. Instead, they did something much more ingenious.

They announced that the world had in fact ended in 1914, and if the rest of us hadn’t noticed, that was our lookout. It is astonishing in the face of such transparent evasions that this religion has any adherents at all. But religions are tough. Either they make no contentions which are subject to disproof or they quickly redesign doctrine after disproof. The fact that religions can be so shamelessly dishonest, so contemptuous of the intelligence of their adherents, and still flourish does not speak very well for the tough-mindedness of the believers. But it does indicate, if a demonstration were needed, that near the core of the religious experience is something remarkably resistant to rational inquiry.

Alan Feuerbacher

For many years now, Alan Feuerbacher has produced valuable work, comments, and research concerning the Watchtower Society and their publications. To raise more awareness of this content, which exists all over the Internet in various places, we have received Alan’s permission to post it here. Much of it discusses the Watchtower’s theories about chronology and prophecy, but much of it also concerns the Watchtower’s use and misuse of information about archaeology, and various scientific topics. The inclusion of Feuerbacher’s writings and research is not an endorsement of all of his views, nor does it indicate that we (at AD1914) have any ownership of this content, which is usually still available on other blogs and forums.

The following content is from on corior.blogspot.com . Initially we will only include content regarding doctrines without including his research on science, evolution, etc. Click the word “here” in each link below to remain on ad1914.com.

We will also obtain permission to include a few other items from other contributors at corior.blogspot.com .

 

Response to Excellent JW Defense by “also anonymous”

Just a few days ago (as of this writing) a person using the name ‘also anonymous’ responded to a topic here with a long and well-organized comment. Based on the amount of work put into this post, we feel it deserves a response, and will provide it here. We have copied the post below and will intersperse comments every paragraph or so.

DEALING WITH GRIEVOUS SITUATIONS AND INJUSTICES
On his last night, before dying, Jesus said “My soul is deeply grieved even to death. … “My father if it is possible, let this cup pass away from me. Yet, not as I will but as you will. …” (Matthew 26:38-42) Jesus was facing a grievous situation, yet he yielded to Jehovah’s will.
God did not take away that grievous matter. He made Jesus deal with it. Today, we may have our own grievous situations. It may not make any sense as to why a thing has happened. Real or perceived injustices, involving imperfect responsible humans, may be going on for longer than we think; seemingly having no end.

This is very true and we agree with it 100%. Jesus was asked to deal with grave injustices, both real injustice, maneuvered by persons with evil intent, and some injustice based on the faulty perception and imperfections of others around him. Yet, Jesus, yielded to Jehovah’s will.

We should add that we never promote the idea that the imperfect humans responsible for promoting imperfect doctrine have done so with evil intent. The intent is usually quite the opposite. It’s with the same honorable intent that we ourselves once promoted such doctrines. We should learn to expect that many will have a zeal for God but not according to accurate knowledge. Our goal should be to yield to Jehovah’s will despite imperfections.

We may be suffering damage and loss due to believing a faulty interpretation, having made serious life decisions because of forcefulness and undue influences that were used. Now we may be suffering financial loss or other problems and we regret those decisions that otherwise would not have been made, if it were not for faulty conclusions and pressure.

It is not common for JWs to admit that other JWs and ex-JWs have truly suffered damage due to believing a faulty interpretation that was promoted by the Governing Body of Jehovah’s Witnesses. Words in defense of JWs are usually carefully crafted so that an “imperfect doctrine” is never called a “wrong teaching” or “false doctrine.” There is usually a shift in wording so that the onus, or fault, is on the one who believed the faulty interpretation. In the above paragraph we should applaud the unusual admission that the “one who believed” did so because of “forcefulness and undue influences that were used.” This is not a specific admission that the undue influence was promoted directly by the Governing Body through the pages of the Watch Tower Society’s publications (including convention speech outlines). But we know that average JWs would never have allowed such influence over them if they thought it came from any other source but the Governing Body, also known as “the faithful and discreet slave.”

Perhaps some interpretations seem questionable. You may be grieved the meaning of the word “generation “(Matt. 24:34) has changed so many times, it appears to have no understandable meaning. Jesus assurance, “Truly I say to you that this generation will by no means pass away…” will be fulfilled as intended, regardless of interpretations. People make up a generation. People die. Therefore “A generation is going and a generation is coming; …” (Eccl 1:4)

That first sentence is amazing. It is primarily made up of “weasel words,” like: perhaps, some, and seem. (See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weasel_word ) Even the idea behind the words “interpretations” and “questionable” are used here as “weasel words.” Such words are so ubiquitous in “Watchtower language” that JWs often don’t notice. We never hear: “The teaching about 1925 was a false doctrine.” Or, “Many past teachings were both wrong and indiscreet.” Instead, is seems that some “interpretations” in the past were probably “questionable.” The Watchtower has even said that increasing light has allowed the Watchtower to become “more discreet” over the years. They were never incorrect, but are now “more correct.” They were never indiscreet, but are now “more discreet.”

The current teaching on the “generation” is simply wrong from a Biblical perspective. It is completely untenable according to the Scriptures. Most JWs who wish to defend their belief, but who also wish to “let their reasonableness be known” will actually not try to defend it outright, but instead attempt to muddy the waters with the various uses of the word “generation” in the Bible, to show that the current untenable teaching is still possible. Of course, the current teaching has nothing to do with any of the varied uses of the word in the Bible or in any dictionary. The topic has been discussed on this forum and others:

  • https://ad1914.com/overlapping-generation-question-based-on-february-2014-watchtower/
  • https://ad1914.com/generation-points-not-in-support-of-jw-teaching/

In addition to muddying the waters, most reasonable defenders of JWs will also revert back to the slightly more sensible teaching that would allow for the original idea to have a fulfillment. They will point out that it’s still possible for this original teaching to be fulfilled as long as we are within say 119 or 120 years of 1914 to allow for those with long lifespans to “not pass away” before they see all these things occur.

There are still a small number who were alive when the gentile times ended. (See internet: List of the verified oldest people – Wikipedia
List of oldest living people – Wikipedia
(Note: other research reports may also exist.)

And here, too, we have an example. It’s an indication that the poster of this comment also does not have a strong belief in the current definition the Governing Body gives to the term “generation” as used by Jesus in Matthew 24, Mark 13 and Luke 21.

Of course, the foundational problem is not in the word “generation.” It’s the fact that the Gentile Times could not have ended in 1914. 1914 was a time when worldwide, international warfare first became common, and it was one of the great historical turning points for a large mass of humanity. But that has nothing to do with the end of the Gentile Times. In fact, it is the very type of historical change that Jesus warned us NOT to think of as a sign of the time of the end. Those topics, too, have been discussed elsewhere on this forum and others.

Some may be grieved their personal dignity has been offended and feelings hurt. Perhaps an influential person’s comments caused others to mistreat or act disrespectfully to you, possibly causing depression, anger negative emotions; isolation.
Remember, “If someone, because of conscience toward God, bears up under grievous things and suffers unjustly, this is an agreeable thing.” Almighty God sees all the injustices done to others and their innocence; we must bear up. “Look! We pronounce happy those who have endured. You have heard of the endurance of Job and have seen the outcome Jehovah gave, that Jehovah is very tender in affection and merciful.”(James 5:11)

The above paragraphs contain good advice. They appear to primarily relate to more general issues that have driven good people away from their former active association among JWs. But the advice is good for all people who have suffered such injustices at the hands of their fellow brothers and sisters, including especially those who have done their best to withstand such abuses while remaining inside the congregations of Jehovah’s Witnesses.

Don’t be infuriated, shaken from good sense or separate from doing God’s will. Realize the tested quality of one’s faith is far more valuable than gold. (1 Pet. 1:7) Wait for God’s reward, don’t fight for vindication. “…endure fully and be long-suffering with joy”. (Col.1:11) Everyone will suffer one way or another. (1 Pet. 5:9-11.)

This is also good advice. I doubt that anyone who recognizes the fact chronology mistakes have plagued the Watch Tower Society for about 140 years, now, will expect any kind of personal vindication. These types of mistakes, errors, and false doctrines, have become ingrained into the traditional end-time teachings and have become “strongly entrenched things” to use a Bible phrase. Even without looking to a specific date (like 1878, 1881, 1910, 1914, 1918, 1925, 1975, or 2000) nearing the supposed end of the “generation” continues to tighten up the possible remaining end dates. It makes JWs anxious about the “times and seasons,” makes them see signs in current political maneuverings, and becomes a primary motivation to serve more urgently. Many JWs therefore serve partly because of the supposed significance of the “times and seasons,” and not purely out of love for Jehovah and neighbor.

Consider Joseph’s multiple problems; betrayed by his brothers, enslaved, falsely accused by Potiphar’s wife and imprisoned. There’s no telling how many other problems he faced with prisoners and people throughout his long period of testing. (Gen. Chapter 37 to 50.) How do you think he felt? Probably like some of you. Yet he did not resort to retaliatory measures. “… Do not avenge yourselves beloved, but yield place to the wrath; for it is written “Vengeance is mine; I will repay, says Jehovah.”(Romans 12: 17-19)
Anointed first century Christians had problems among themselves. That’s why Col.3: 13 advises “Continue putting up with one another and forgiving one another freely if anyone has a cause for complaint…. Even as Jehovah freely forgave you, so do you also.” especially if, “they do not know what they are doing.” (Luke23:34)

This is generally good advice, too, but appears to be used in a single direction only. Remember that God’s word is a “two-edged” sword. When a JW prays, studies, and meditates on Bible questions, the JW may soon realize that the Bible clears up any doubt about various false teachings that the Watchtower has promoted. When Bible Students realized that the early teachings about 1918 and 1925 were false, they were treated as the “evil slave” and had no place among the other Watchtower followers. Long after 1914, if someone were to insist that Jesus began his presence in 1914 or began ruling as king in 1914, he could be branded as an “evil slave.” Even though this is the current belief, he would be “evil” for holding to such a belief prior to the time when the Governing Body (Rutherford) officially changed that belief.  In fact, the Watch Tower Society had to wait until after Rutherford died before they were able to officially change the beginning of Christ’s presence from 1874 to 1914. (The change happened in 1943/1944.)

Even the so-called apostasy that became apparent more recently in the early 1980’s and 1990’s was related to increased access to evidence showing that the end of the Gentile Times was not in 1914, if the Bible is to believed. Those who no longer believed in 1914 could no longer be JWs in good standing even though many wanted to remain. They were labeled a “cancer.” They were labeled “poisonous.” The Watch Tower publications labeled them as “wicked” and undeserving of life.

So one wonders why they were sought out and sometimes “viciously” torn from their families and often even their means of livelihood, through disfellowshipping. It appeared that the Watch Tower Society was going through a period when they forgot about forgiveness, and preferred vindictiveness and retaliatory measures.

The idea that people who contribute to a site such as this one are also angry and vindictive doesn’t seem right at all. Speaking personally, I have no vindictiveness or malice toward anyone in the Watch Tower Society leadership, or any Jehovah’s Witnesses personally. I still consider many of them to be among my best friends. There will be some who are also responding to the injustice of having been torn from their loved ones for no other reason than that they wished to uphold God’s Word over the traditions of men. That is easy to understand. But there are very few vocal ones among the hundreds of thousands of former Witnesses. The few who are vocal are found online, and are incorrectly thought to represent the thousands who have resigned themselves to merely live a peaceable, godly life and who have thrown their burden on Jehovah. Only a tiny percentage would ever try to convince JWs that they are wrong about chronology. A majority have no doubt resigned themselves to merely hope for the best over the pitiful reactions of those friends and family who have closed their minds and who appear to have “no natural affection.” But over time, some of these same friends and family will also come to see the error of the Watchtower’s controlling doctrines, and are often rejoined with these friends and family. The joy and love in such reunions is amazing, and shows that it was not the true desire of the Witnesses to have “no natural affection” but just another mistake made under the undue influence of the Watch Tower’s teachings. Jesus, along with the rest of the Bible, teaches love and forgiveness. Just as you have yourself pointed out in the following paragraphs:

Handling grievous problems requires forgiveness. Everyone has limitations and weakness. To demand or expect something from others unable to deliver because of a limited mental capacity or personality flaw lacks understanding, insight and mercy. (Must read: 1 Cor. 1: 26-31)
“If you forgive men their trespasses, your heavenly Father will also forgive you.” Matt. 6:14 (see Matt. 18:35) Happy are the merciful, since they will be shown mercy.” (Matt. 5:7, See also Matt 5:30 & 7: 1-5)
Love “Does not keep account of the injury”. (1 Cor.13: 4, 5) It’s our obligation to forgive even serious injury. Let it go, regardless of continued suffering.
“For there is no man righteous in the earth that keeps doing good and does not sin.” (Ecclesiastes 7:20) (See Psalm 130:3, Pr. 15:18)

Very true. Even where we see an older man promoting a sect, we are not to quickly bring a charge against him. (Titus 3:10) We expect a measure of false teachings to mix with the true teachings, and we expect that true teachings, at times, can only be understood well when this process is accepted:

(1 Cor 11: 18,19) For first of all, I hear that when you come together in a congregation, divisions exist among you; and to an extent I believe it. 19  For there will certainly also be sects among you, so that those of you who are approved may also become evident.

“The insight of a man certainly slows down his anger, and it is beauty on his part to pass over transgression.” (Proverbs 9: 11) “The one covering over a transgression is seeking love, and he that keeps talking about a matter is separating those familiar with one another.”(Proverbs 17:9) Stop complaining, talking and thinking about it; don’t victimize yourself!
If you have been the victim of serious wrongs, allowing anger to take root cultivates hatred. “However, I say to you that everyone who continues wrathful with his brother will be accountable to the court of justice; …” (Matt. 5:22, See also James 4:11)

I agree with you. This is also a good reminder for those who feel hurt by being forced out of the congregations of Jehovah’s Witnesses. Many are understandably angry over the injustice. There is no reason to continue complaining about it. In the end it is often only Jehovah who we can count on to provide true justice. Injustice will happen in this world. Organizations are infamous for protecting themselves at the expense of the little ones who can be tossed aside in the interests of protecting their reputation. We see this in colleges and various sports, educational, and religious institutions in the area of child sexual abuse, too. An organization rarely admits it was wrong unless forced to do so.

Those who discover that a true and clear Bible teaching differs from the current view promoted by the Watch Tower organization will sometimes be treated with disdain just as the young person was kicked out of the synagogue for believing in Jesus after his blindness was healed.

One could argue that Jesus parable of the woman who persistently seeks justice from a judge might apply. (Luke 18:1-8) But this is primarily about seeking ultimate justice from Jehovah, not through our own efforts.

I should mention however that the general feeling behind a site such as this one is not at all to try to get back at anyone for hurting them. It is merely to point out an area that still traps many Jehovah’s Witnesses and from which they could easily break free of the bonds of this false part of their religion by openly seeking truth. These are matters that many Jehovah’s Witnesses still struggle with. We recommend prayer, study and meditation upon these things. Our motive is no different from the motive many of us had helping others while we were Witnesses, and the same motive that some of us have who are still Witnesses struggling to keep a clean conscience as we keep an eye on our teaching.

Part of the sign Jesus gave about his presence was “Then, also, many will be stumbled and will betray one another, and will hate one another.” (Matt. 24:10) This would go on during the kingdom preaching work. (Matt. 24:14) That’s exactly what is happening now! It is seen by those who publically point the finger of blame, have a vengeful spirit, try bringing ruin, set up contrary web sites, give away faults, publish contrary literature, slander, gossip, ridicule and publicly protest. This can stumble others, cause divisions and prevent people from accepting the lifesaving kingdom message.
Jesus asserted”…It is unavoidable that causes for stumbling should come. Nevertheless, woe to the one through whom they come. It would be of more advantage to him if a millstone were suspended from his neck and he were thrown into the sea than for him to stumble one of these little ones.” (Luke 17: 1, 2)

It is a danger, true. We should all take care that the motives behind our various ministries are proper. The Watch Tower Society has a long history of pointing the blame at various religions that they oppose. The Watch Tower Society has proven itself to be a formidable opposer of Catholicism, Communism, Nazi Fascism, the United Nations. The Watch Tower Society has proven itself to be a formidable opposer of most forms of Protestantism by the opposition to Trinity, Hell-fire, Immortality of the Soul, etc. They oppose nationalism, war, political involvement. Jehovah’s Witnesses are opposers who point the finger of blame and give away the faults of other religions, especially. They have set up a web site contrary to the teachings of most religions, they publish contrary literature.

But most of the teachings of Jehovah’s Witnesses are proper and correct, and Biblical. And the level of opposition that JWs promote should be considered acceptable in most free societies.

When a person can show where the Watch Tower Society has promoted a false teaching, however, the rules appear to change. How can anyone else point out our faults? Must this be considered a good approach when the WTS does it, but a bad approach when anyone else does it? That would be presumptuous and indiscreet and hypocritical, not worthy of a faithful and discreet slave.

But, as mentioned before, the WTS will slander, gossip and ridicule those who have left the organization. They create divisions in families. Thousands of little ones have been stumbled. The WTS even admits that thousands were stumbled over issues they promoted like 1975. Will it be any different over issues like covering up child sexual abuse? Will it be any different, over time, as many persons become disenchanted over the misuse of the “overlapping generation” teaching. It will be a slower process of disappointment, disenchantment, discouragement, depression, yet the result is the same.

Expectation postponed makes the heart sick, But a desire realized is a tree of life. (Proverbs 13:12)

Those who at one time took up the kingdom message are now betraying it by fighting against those who are faithfully bringing this message of mercy to the world before the great day of God the almighty. (Acts 20:30 mention those who draw away disciples after themselves.)

Again, it is not accurate at all to say that those who have discovered the problems with “strongly entrenched things” are betraying the kingdom message. Especially when what they have learned actually clears up the kingdom message and allows us to take off the chronology blinders that hide a good portion of the kingdom message.

There is nothing wrong with the fact that the Watchtower has promoted a message that Jesus is now King, he is present, and that he will soon return and bring an end to the present worldly system at any time, and without warning. This is in line with one of the primary themes of the Christian Greek Scriptures. We must be ready at all times, and pay attention to what sort of persons we ought to be, because the end can come at any time, unannounced, like a thief in the night. We are thus forewarned, and the kingdom message is a reminder of the approaching nearness of the end, along with a promise relief from this system and a paradise future. This is all Biblical and no one should be fighting against that. However, any message that also presumptuously claims to know the times and seasons of that return is being indiscreet. It would be trying to attract people to a specific version of that kingdom message based on self-aggrandizing pride in having been given a special insight into the “times and seasons” which is in Jehovah’s jurisdiction. (Acts 1, Matthew 24, 1 & 2 Thessalonians, 1 & 2 Peter) As stated before, it is often also used as a primary motivator, which is unchristian. It is precisely what Jesus was warning against in Matthew 24, when Jesus showed the impossibility of trying to use wars, famines, earthquakes, etc., as signs of the end. The very idea of presumptuous, supposed knowledge of the times and seasons would create false prophets who would claim to have such knowledge about the parousia. In other words, the current version of the kingdom message promoted by the Watchtower has elements that Jesus warned us against. Jesus did not want people misled or stumbled. This is why he warned us against looking for signs of the parousia. (Matthew 24)

And this brings us to one of the biggest dangers is that the human presumptuousness and indiscreet claims of knowing more about the times and seasons. It will draw off disciples who will follow the prideful idea of having more insight than others on this topic of the times and seasons. It draws disciples away from the true kingdom message that focuses on patience, hope, love, promise, relief — whether it happens in our current lifetime or, in effect, our next conscious moment, the split-second after we die.

Failure to show mercy is a betrayal of the kingdom message, which is mercy in connection with Jesus ransom sacrifice, along with a merciful God, a kindly forgiving king and a heavenly government that restores sinful mankind willing to make changes in their lives.
Proverbs 11:13 “The one walking about as a slanderer is uncovering confidential talk, but the one faithful in spirit is covering over a matter.” (See also Pr. 20:19, James 3: 6 – 8, Proverbs 11:9)

True. Very true.

The portion about a slanderer uncovering confidential talk cannot apply to our preaching about the kingdom, however. There is nothing confidential about the kingdom. We are asked to preach about it from the rooftops. We are not to hide it in the field, or keep it under a measuring basket. There is nothing hidden that will not be uncovered.  Our joy in that kingdom promise, and our love for it, will motivate us to become a teacher and bring out things both old and new.

The biblical message that God has established a heavenly government that will eliminate all corrupt earthly governments and bring the earth to paradise conditions is the only hope for mankind. Spending time and efforts to unveil the mistakes and sins of imperfect limited humans because of refusal to forgive, concealing a sin or being afraid to preach, reveals hatred, betrayal and self-deception.
Becoming like those religious leaders who prevented others from accepting Jesus message is evil. They were told, “Woe to you scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! Because you shut up the kingdom of the heavens before men; for you yourselves do not go in, neither do you permit those on their way in to go in.” (Matt. 23:13)
Everyone will be judged. “Keep on blessing those who persecute; be blessing and do not be cursing.” (Romans 12: 14 see also vs. 19) “Also, just as you want men to do to you, do the same way to them.” (Luke 6:31)
Putting oneself in the position of the“…good-for-nothing man” who “is digging up what is bad, and upon his lips there is as it were, a scorching fire.”, is unwise. (Pr. 16:27.) A person may be partially right but largely wrong. “There exists a way that is upright before a man, but the ways of death are the end of it afterwards,” (Pr. 14:12, see also James 4:11)

There is nothing wrong with the Biblical message you and I seem to share, as you expressed above about the heavenly government for which we pray and which we teach others about.  On your point about those religious leaders who prevented others from accepting Jesus message, we don not consider the leaders of the Watch Tower Society to be “evil.” It’s true that they have often prevented others from accepting the true spirit of Jesus’ message, by pointing to signs and dates, against Jesus’ direct counsel. But this is because they knew not what they were doing. It was very common especially in the 19th century, to try to prove that you had more of God’s insight than others by predicting a date. Dates will draw off followers away from Christ’s message and to the people themselves who are most convincing or who have the most charisma. Most people like to follow, and are anxious for something visible to follow.

It is not easy for most followers to see when their leaders are acting like Pharisees. Human pride, and the wish to be right on all matters, and at all costs, will make most people happy to see those leaders kick people out for their Bible beliefs about the parousia. But they will think they are doing it for God. Most JWs feel even more secure in their belief when they see others kicked out for disagreeing. Persecuting others in this way makes them feel like the ones being persecuted over this matter. Therefore they can put it out of their mind. This is how it happens that traditions and ideologies that are completely wrong can seem upright to a man. Mixing what it wrong with what is right allows the wrong to hide, the weeds among the wheat, as it were.

Fighting against Christ’s brothers, the kingdom preaching work and being unmerciful causes one to be “overreached by Satan”. Paul writes, “Anything you kindly forgive anyone, I do too. In fact, as for me, whatever I have kindly forgiven, if I have kindly forgiven anything, it has been for your sakes in Christ’s sight; that we may not be overreached by Satan, …” (2 Cor. 2:10 & 11) Satan overreaches an unmerciful person. He catches them alive! 2 Tim. 2:26 states “and they may come back to their proper senses out from the snare of the Devil, seeing that they have been caught alive by him for the will of that one.” Satan’s will is to fight against the kingdom preaching, its supporters and prevent others from listening and accepting the kingdom message.

As stated before, there is no reason to go so far as to claim that the Watch Tower Society is fighting against Christ’s brothers. I would guess that the vast majority of the opposers in the WTS believe they are doing the right thing, according to their conscience. Some will make this claim, that the WTS has been persecuting Christ’s brothers, but there are no doubt many of Christ’s brothers who are to be found among the congregations of Jehovah’s Witnesses. And many more will see through the presumptuousness of this appeal to be motivated by a knowledge of the “times and seasons” and therefore will not likely, at this time at least, see any value in joining the specific ministry of Jehovah’s Witnesses. Some will find they are better at a ministry in helping their neighbor, feeding the hungry, doing what they can in hospitals, shelters, helping the elderly, looking after orphans who need attention, and myriad other problems that this godless system has heaped upon the world. As members of a large and impressive teaching ministry, the JWs still have much to be thankful for, and proud of, too.  More people should be aware of the upbuilding and encouraging Bible-based teachings of JWs. But this does not mean that the Watchtower leaders should feel they are above allowing themselves to be corrected by direct Bible teachings on such important matters. Satan’s influence, especially, is based on pride. It’s easy to see by a historical study of the Watchtower’s false claims, that it was pride that overreached them. But there is still time to come to one’s proper senses in this area. Speaking on a personal level, I am thankful for the teachings of JWs that helped bring me to my proper senses. It’s a matter of humility.

Forgiveness, frees you from Satan’s grasp and condemnatory judgment.
Avoid extended problems with others. Paul said “Why do you not rather let yourselves be wronged?” (1 Cor. 6:7) Let it go, keep quiet, have peace, serve kingdom interests, give “… a sacred service with your power of reason”. (Romans 12:1)
Regardless of the deep short falling of imperfect individuals keep in mind that judgment has been committed to Christ. “The Father judges no one at all, but he has committed all the judging to the Son. (John 5:22)

Excellent points.

Jesus said, “Many will say to me in that day, ’Lord Lord’, did we not prophecy in your name and perform many powerful works in your name?” And yet I will confess to them: I never knew you! Get away from me, you workers of lawlessness.” (Matt 7:22, 23) When Jesus denies those individuals the use of his ransom sacrifice, they are doomed!
Jesus brothers are human and imperfect like everyone else. They do not perform miracles, are not infallible and are not inspired like the apostles. This may be why Jesus refers to some of them as “the least of these my brothers.” (Matt 25:40, 41, 1 Co.1: 26-31) Yet, “And in reply the king will say to them,” Truly I say to you, to the extent that you did it to one of the least of these my brothers, you did it to me. …he will say, in turn, to those on his left, “Be on your way from me, you who have been cursed, into the everlasting fire prepared for the Devil and his angels.” (Matthew 25:40)

You probably are implying that “Jesus’ brothers” refer to those who have claimed to be the only channel of truth, the Governing Body, who claim not just to represent the “faithful and discreet slave” but who claim to actually be the only 8 living members of that “slave” on earth today.

This, of course, is at odds with everything Jesus said about that “slave” and is an indication itself that someone has not been faithful and discreet with the words of Jesus. Not that there is anything wrong with having an administrative body. What’s wrong is thinking of them as governors of your faith, or your earthly leaders. They can have a ministry just as other members of the congregation may have various ministries.

Look more closely at Jesus’ own words about these brothers, and you will not have to come up with improbable reasons why Jesus spoke of them as “the least of these, my brothers.” It wasn’t because they were any more or less imperfect than others. These brothers, Jesus said, are the ones who are most in need of someone to help them, teach them, feed them, clothe them, visit them when they are sick. This Governing Body could be included but it would be directly against the teaching of Jesus to say that they are these particular brothers. All of us are responsible for doing good wherever the opportunities for doing good present themselves.

As long as those proclaiming the pure kingdom message do not commit a sin that incurs death, no accusation will stand.

You really shouldn’t judge someone’s eternal prospects, although I can see you are merely defending them, which is good. It’s up to all of us to keep close watch on our conscience, our teaching and other parts of our ministry, and to let our reasonableness be known to all men, and to not hold back in defending our faith and the hope within us. But we can’t really speak for others. If we use the Bible as our constitution and consider the value of a commentary such as the Watch Tower publications, we can appreciate the efforts put forth by those who would lead us. But where we see the Bible takes precedence, we can point this out without concern that we are “accusing” anyone else. We are merely doing the right thing by putting the word of God above the word of men.

Even if the problem continues, causing suffering. “If anyone catches sight of his brother sinning a sin that does not incur death, he will ask, and he will give life to him, yes, to those not sinning so as to incur death. There is a sin that does incur death. It is concerning that sin that I do not tell him to make request. All unrighteousness is sin; and yet there is a sin that does not incur death.” 1 John 5: 16, 17
Being unmerciful is a sin that incurs death. (See Matt. 6:14 & 15)
Regardless of complaints; nothing will stand. “Who will file an accusation against God’s chosen ones? God is the one who declares them righteous. Who is he that will condemn? Christ Jesus is the one who died, who is on the right hand of God, who also pleads for us.” (Romans 8: 33, 34) “Who are you to judge the house servant of another? To his own master he stands or falls. Indeed, he will be made to stand, for Jehovah can make him stand.” “For we shall all stand before the judgment seat of God.” (Romans 14:4. 10)
“Jehovah is redeeming the soul of his servants; And none of those taking refuge in him will be held guilty.” (Psalm 34:22: See also Heb.2:11; 11:16)

This is a fair synopsis about seeing love, mercy and justice as the more important things. We don’t judge one another. We can’t really see the heart motives of others. Sometimes a Watchtower writer or speaker will print or admit their motive, inadvertently sometimes, and this may help us understand them better. But we still don’t judge them. People can be wrong for the right reasons and right for the wrong reasons. People who create web sites like this one, of course, are usually judged as wrong for the wrong reasons. : )

You can’t go wrong showing mercy, obeying Jehovah’s laws, having a repentant attitude and preaching the kingdom!

Amen!

BAPTISM:
Repentance and baptism are required first steps to salvation. (See 1 Pet. 3:21, Acts 2:38, Matt. 28:19, 20)

True.

BIBLICAL MORALS:
Those wanting Jehovah’s approval must obey his moral standards without exception. When someone commits an error, true repentance is required. “Each of us will render an account for himself to God.” (Romans 14:12 See also 1 John 5:17 & Heb. 10: 26, 27)

Absolutely!

SIGN OF THE LAST DAYS
Concerning the sign of his presence and the conclusion of the system of things, Jesus stated “For nation will rise against nation and kingdom against kingdom.” (Matt.24: 3 to 14)

You left out the part where Jesus said, concerning this request for a sign of the parousia, that he actually said NOT to be misled by “signs” like wars and nations that will rise against nations. Initially the Watch Tower had this right in claiming that Jesus was saying there would be wars and earthquakes all along the 1800 years of history prior to his parousia. The Watch Tower once claimed that this referred to all the years of wars, famines, earthquakes that had taken place in the first century, the second century, the third century, etc., all the way through the 19th century. If you read the context carefully you will see why this makes more sense. The whole point was how the parousia would sweep upon them as quickly and unexpectedly as a huge flash of lightning, or a thief in the night, or even in the way it came without warning upon Sodom (Luke 21). People would act as if without a clue, continuing to eat and drink and get married as they did in Noah’s day when the flood suddenly swept them away.

When the Great War, which was later renamed World War I by historians, began, that is exactly what happened. Between the years of 1914 to 1918 there were 46 declarations of war making up World War I. Those who argue that World War One was not a world war but a European war are evading the issue if they use it to deny the presence of Christ. (See Matt. 24 and the internet:
Timeline of World War I – Wikipedia
Timeline of Major War Declarations in World War I – Family Tree
World War I: Declarations of War from Around the Globe | Law Library…

1914 was a huge turning point in the history of modern people for many reasons. It wasn’t the only one, but it was definitely a major one. But those who argue that this makes it a sign of the last days are evading the counsel of Jesus in Matthew 24 and that of several other Bible writers.

Today this unified message of Matt.6:10 “Let your kingdom come. Let your will take place as in heaven, also upon earth.” in accord with Daniel 2:44 “…the God of heaven will set up a kingdom that will never be brought to ruin. …” is being preached in 240 lands by imperfect humans. It is the most historical and unified preaching work that has ever taken place on earth since the first century. It is the greatest act of mercy to all mankind before God passes judgment. (Matt 24; 14 & Zeph1:14-18) Billions of pieces of literature have been printed and distributed. Jehovah’s Witnesses are the only ones going door to door with this message and fulfilling the prophecy of the world wide preaching work! (Matt.24:14)
The message of God’s kingdom to replace all human governments would only take place during the presence of the king, Jesus Christ. It could have never been accomplished if Christ were not enthroned. When it’s finished, Christ will say, “Well done, good and faithful slave …” (Matt. 25:21-23)
To argue against the sign of Christ’s presence, is to deny he is in kingdom power and a betrayal of the kingdom message. A lack of faith! (Heb. 3:12-14)

Except for some Biblical inaccuracies that are easy for anyone to catch, there is nothing wrong, in general, with the preaching of the Kingdom message as it is done by Jehovah’s Witnesses. I also agree that it is significant and historical. But this is no reason to include known inaccuracies in that work, is it? From the 1870’s through the 1940’s this preaching work included the teaching that Jesus’ presence had begun in 1874. Would it have been wrong to correct such a point, or would it have been wrong for a JW to avoid this teaching if he or she knew it was wrong? From the mid-1950’s, revived strongly in 1966, through the mid-1970’s, that same preaching work included a focus on what would most likely happen in the mid-1970’s. Then it became the preaching work that would be completed by the end of the 20th century. Up until just 7 years ago, it was the preaching work that would be completed within the maximum lifespan of people born in or before the year 1914. Even if most of the message was correct, would it have been wrong for a JW to avoid or correct this particular point? Would it have been wrong for him or her to present the Biblical evidence against this point to the Watch Tower Society? Currently, the kingdom message includes the idea that this generation that will not pass away, will finally pass away within the lifespan of certain Jehovah’s Witnesses who claimed to be anointed before the end of the lifespan of certain other Jehovah’s Witnesses who had claimed to be anointed prior to 1914. If a JW finds Biblical evidence that this part of the kingdom message is a false doctrine, should he be required to keep that to himself or herself? If a person discovers that the Bible gives overwhelming evidence that the Gentile Times did not end in 1914, should they keep that to themselves?

Should they hide it or keep it under a measuring basket? I suppose it depends on whether truth is important or not. Perhaps it’s dependent on whether we truly have more loyalty to Jehovah than to men.

TEACHINGS / INTERPRETATIONS:
To keep up with current changes see http://www.jw.org , click “Clarifications of Beliefs”.
If you disagree with certain teachings or interpretations don’t be bothered or distracted. The full truth will be made known as hidden information is uncovered. Wrong teachings have and will be dropped.

That may be true that wrong teachings have and will be dropped. But the wrong teaching about 1874 was kept for 70 years. The wrong teaching about when Jesus began his kingdom (1878) was kept for many years beyond 1914. The Watchtower now claims to have been wrong about who the “faithful and discreet slave” is for 130 years.

What’s the point of calling a doctrine “questionable” as you did above, if it cannot be questioned?

Does Jehovah say not to be bothered or distracted about false teachings and false interpretations? The Bible says to pay attention to ourselves and to our teaching. The Bible says to test the teachings, to keep proving to ourselves what is good and acceptable, to see whether these things are so, to overcome strongly entrenched things. So who are you following when you say we should not be bothered or distracted about false teachings? Are we slaves of men or of God? Is it men we are trying to please.

The core teaching about the kingdom of God is a pure message. Prophets of old spoke about it. Today “…Many will rove about, and the true knowledge will become abundant.” “…those having insight will understand.”(Daniel 12:4, 10)
”For we have partial knowledge and we prophecy partially; but when that which is complete arrives, that which is partial will be done away with.” (1 Cor. 13:9, 10) Part of what we believe will be right and part will be temporarily wrong.

This has proved to be true, especially what Daniel said about the time when the sealed scrolls would be shut, compared to when Revelation says that it was then time for those sealed scrolls to be opened up. Since then many have roved about, and true knowledge, the very Christian Scriptures themselves, has become abundant. Yet, as you show, none will have perfect knowledge until that perfect day when that which is partial will done away with. You are absolutely right about our level of knowledge being incomplete. But, again, this should not be an excuse to disobey Jehovah when he tells us to pay attention to our teaching and continue testing it.

HANDLING PROBLEMS:
If you think a person or group are wrong, it’s best to take it up with those individuals. If you’re successful be happy. If not, don’t broadcast it worldwide, causing divisions, stumbling and disharmony; making trouble. Remember, “Therefore just as the weeds are collected and burned with fire, so it will be in the conclusion of the system of things. The Son of man will send forth his angles, and they will collect out from his kingdom all things that cause stumbling and persons that are doing lawlessness, and they will pitch them into the fiery furnace. …” (Matt. 13: 40 – 42) Don’t be one of those!
Those who teach will receive a heavier judgment. (James 3:1)

I have seen and heard plenty of evidence that in the early 1970’s it was common for several brothers who later become members of the Governing Body to express a lack of belief in many matters of chronology. Some of these expressions were regarding the undue pressure that Fred Franz was putting on everyone to get behind his 1975 doctrine. Some of these were with respect to the inconsistencies surrounding our treatment of the 1,260 and 1,335 days, etc., or the focus on prophecy fulfilled 1918 and 1919. After Fred Franz died, all of the 1918 teachings finally dropped, but many of the 1919 teachings still exist. At least 5 members of the Governing Body had been known to speak out against the “generation of 1914” some expressing doubts about the 1914 date itself. I cannot personally verify more than 2 of these. But I have seen good evidence for at least 4. And, of course, it is well known that several brothers were dismissed from the Writing Department and Service Department for admitting during the 1980 inquisition that they did not believe in the 1914 date.

In my own personal case, I have already taken these issues up with the leadership of the Watch Tower Society over a course of several years. Some of those in leadership positions have been understanding of the problem and have admitted that they too are waiting for a time when some of these doctrines will be corrected.  Yet, even the most understanding ones, still threatened dire warnings of punishment and disfellowshipping if I were to explain my feelings to fellow JWs. I never personally had the same expertise of some brothers who spent years looking into the matters from the perspective of the original Bible languages, or from the perspective of Bible-related archaeology. But I have seen how these brothers, too, were treated upon presenting the Bible evidence and the historical evidence to the leadership of the WTS.

So we already have a record of what will happen if any of us were to take this topic up with those individuals who continue to promote these traditions. We already have statements in the publications as to what will most likely happen. We will have to recant and repent of such thinking or face being “expelled from the synagogue.” Therefore, the matter has already been taken to the individuals responsible. While some issues that were considered “apostate” in the recent past (see books by Ray Franz) have now been corrected, this particular issue of 1914 has not been. Whether one decides to hide the issue is a matter of personal conscience. The Bible tells us that if the individuals will not listen, we should take it to the congregation. But it was not speaking specifically of doctrinal matters. Matters of dishonesty, and hiding evidence, really are matters for the congregation to be aware of, however.

REPENTANCE:
“Jehovah is not slow respecting his promise, as some people consider slowness, but he is patient with you because he does not desire any to be destroyed but desires all to attain repentance.” (2 Peter 3:9)
Repentance means changing your mind to agree with God’s thinking, doing what’s required.
If any have strayed due to faulty interpretations, expectations, or teaching; if some fleshly weakness has overtaken you, or some treatment you received; realize the sacrifice of Christ runs deep and forgiveness is through the open door of repentance. With new information comes a new mind on matters.
It is hoped this information will return all sheep to Christ before final judgment arrives. (Matt. 24:34)

This is all correct of course. As JWs, we are always taught to blend the terms “God’s thinking” with the “organization’s thinking.” We are told that we can’t think of Jehovah separately from his organization. We must use terms like “spirit-directed” organization, but we are not allowed to “test the spirits” (1 John 4:1) as this would be presumptuous. If we were to find that God’s thinking differed from that of the organization, we would be subject to disfellowshipping unless we repented of that idea. Only the Governing Body have the right to notice when God’s thinking differs from the organization’s thinking. True repentance, however, means exactly what you said above: changing our mind to agree with God’s thinking.

This reminds me of an argument that the Watchtower published in one of the old “Kingdom Ministry” brochures back when it was called the “Bulletin.” Jehovah’s Witnesses in the early 1930’s were being asked to continue to sell the 6 volumes of Studies in the Scriptures that were originally published by Charles Taze Russell because there were still so many hundreds of thousands of these books in stock. But the question from the colporteurs who were selling these books was about their conscience. How could they conscientiously sell books (yes, JWs still used the term “sell” back then) when almost everything they taught about 1878, 1881, 1910, 1914, 1915, the resurrection, the influence of the holy spirit, was now considered to be false, in one case (Great Pyramid) even Satanic?

Of course, the answer was that disobeying Judge Rutherford was the same as disobeying the Lord. The methods of blurring the line between God and the organization are just as prevalent, although they are now worded in a more acceptable manner.

I bring this up because you mention repenting and returning to “God’s thinking.” This has a much different meaning to an ex-JW who has thought the matter through. Many persons are forced to leave the organization because this is the only way they can conscientiously return to Jehovah and Christ. Obviously, this would make about as much sense to you as it would have made to me before I thought things through more thoroughly. When a JW reads the “Return to Jehovah” brochure, they are really only thinking of how a person will return to the “Organization.” There is no other possible meaning to a JW in good standing.

When enduring personal injustices, be patient, don’t retaliate. By keeping quiet, the matter will be dead on your side: it may end sooner. Fighting back extends trouble. Jesus’, enemies did what they could to discredit and stop him. Jesus continued with the kingdom preaching work, so did his apostles. Pointing out what we think is wrong isn’t necessarily going to change it. (See Micah 7:1-3) Micah said “I will show a waiting attitude (wait patiently) for the God of my salvation.” (Micah 7:7)
At 1 Peter 2:21-23 “…even Christ suffered for you leaving for you a model for you to follow. …When he was being reviled he did not go reviling in return, When he was suffering he did not go threatening , but kept on committing himself to the one who judges righteously.” The model is in suffering, both inside and outside the Christian congregation. Remember, “… a slave is not greater than his master…” John 13:16) Jesus had trouble with others and so will we. (Luke 4:16-30)

Speaking for myself again, I was never wronged, nor did I endure any personal injustice over which I would ever think of retaliating. I am not an organization that has any vested interest in a specific doctrine. If I discover I’ve made a mistake in my thinking, I’m free to humbly correct my thinking immediately. I did live through the 1975 teachings, but I am no worse off for them. Who knows what I might have done differently? I went to Bethel, left Bethel, stayed in my congregation for several years, continued actively preaching and teaching. Things worked out just fine. I had plenty of Bible studies during the 1975 period and I do feel badly for having misled them by leaving so much Watchtower literature that pushed 1975, and we always studied the old 1968 version of the “Truth” book that pushed 1975. Only a few of my Bible studies were baptized. I learned the truth about 1914 while at Bethel. Many others did, too. Anyone who was serious about using their time at Bethel to do more personal study, and speak with more mature elders in responsible positions could hardly help but meet people who had already thought about the problems of our chronology doctrines. Like me, none of them thought that it would change any time soon, so we were patient. I waited until the early 1990’s before finally saying much of anything publicly, having known of the problems for about 15 years by then.

Yes, I was reviled for bringing up the topic privately with an elder I sought counsel from. I had already spoken privately to persons at Bethel about my options for which talks I could give in good conscience and asked for advice. Again I was threatened with disfellowshipping, and decided to wait on Jehovah a few more years. But now I was always under suspicion, and was being assigned almost every meeting part related to 1914 or the organization. As I was a pioneer, the circuit overseer came to work with me in service to listen to my approach at the door. A person from Brooklyn Bethel came to listen to most of my hour talks. I even conducted a book study that was sometimes audited. I had no trouble with others because I had no trouble keeping these issues to myself.

It was only after much prayer and consideration that I realized that I could no longer conscientiously teach from the platform what I knew to be falsehoods. How could I be a hypocrite in field service and others to change their beliefs, if my own conscience let me know that I was compromising from the platform. I never wanted to leave the Witnesses, but I did ask to be removed from some of my speaking privileges and assignments. Then I asked to be removed from my position.

That’s what resulted in the more serious threats and multiple attempts began to get me on the phone with two elders at once. (That’s the signal of the beginning of a judicial meeting.) I had a chance to “fade” without incident, and took it. If I attempt to come back it’s been made clear that I will face an inquisition to recant, or be disfellowshipped. This allows me at least to take care of my aging parents, and keep many of my best and closest friends among the Witnesses.

The best thing one can do is stop ridiculing, finger pointing, tattle tailing, complaining, and protesting publically. Shut down and stop hosting negative web sites for unmerciful, complainers and fault finders. Benefit with works of repentance
Change to a mental attitude of mercy. Keep quiet over things you don’t agree with. “Be agitated, but do not sin. Have your say in your heart, upon your bed and keep silent. “(Psalm4:4) Join in with the pure unified kingdom preaching work.
Have lowliness of mind and humble yourself under the mighty hand of God. (1Pet. 5:5, 6) Its sound advice, you can’t go wrong. Some may have to swallow their pride and apply for reinstatement.

Everyone’s experience is a little different. Through this website, however, I have met several with an experience similar to mine. The love and concern for our fellow brothers and sisters is wonderful. Even though we were thrown out, the love for Jehovah is still there. This is not true of all, of course. Many have had the idea that if the Witnesses are hypocritical, then there is nothing else out there to believe in. Some of these “little ones” have even committed suicide over the harsh treatment of being shunned only for their love of truth. We knew it could happen when we were Witnesses, but we only expected it from outside the Witnesses. We would never expect some of the most hateful and inhumane treatment to come from Witnesses themselves. I’ve known some who had to face disfellowshipping, and some were able to fade without such an incident. Today, it’s easier to “fade” than it was in the 80’s and 90’s. The problem with disfellowshipping is that one is forced to lie about their beliefs in order to gain reinstatement. But if one wishes to honor their mother and father, or sometimes to see their own children and grandchildren, some have resorted to lying in order not to forsake the family bond.

The generation that was alive when the gentile times ended will still be alive when “the end” comes. To those who are unrepentant or unprepared it will come as a snare. (Luke 21:35)
This message is an act of mercy to those who have fallen into a pit of inactivity or opposition to the kingdom work. It’s meant to pull them out of the pit. “…If a certain man comes to have a hundred sheep and one of them gets strayed, will he not leave the ninety-nine upon the mountains and set out on a search for the one that is straying? And if he happens to find it, I certainly tell you, he rejoices more over it than over the nine-nine that have not strayed. Likewise, it is not a desirable thing with my Father who is in heaven for one of these little ones to perish.” (Matt. 18:12-14)
”Pursue peace with all people, and the sanctification without which no man will see the Lord, carefully watching that no one may be deprived of the underserved kindness of God, that no poisonous root may spring up and cause trouble and that many may not be defiled by it.” (Hebrews 12:14, 15)

I am convinced that your motive for warning me is good and sincere. I am just as concerned that end will come as a snare for those who are motivated by the wrong reasons. Jesus went to the trouble to warn us specifically against being motivated by the “times and seasons” because it is a common, human desire to know when something is going to happen. I don’t hold the view that I am saving lives by pointing out what Jesus said about proper motivation. I appreciate what it has done for me and I want to share it. But I don’t think it’s improper for those who have learned something important to share it. It may not seem as important to others, but we should still share what we have learned. If we are humble we will be corrected by those who can to show us where we have erred. And it may be that if others are humble, they might truly appreciate the fact that something good about the kingdom message was shared  with them.

Some have been away from this work for so long, those who have caused problems most likely have moved, are incapacitated or dead. Newer ones have taken their place and may not be aware of past issues.
If you, the reader, know anyone who needs this information or help recovering from stumbling, please pass it along.
If you have heard negative reports about imperfect people, don’t let that prevent you from inheriting everlasting life. Keep in mind there were negative things said about the apostles. Even Jesus, who “…committed no sin, nor was deception found in his mouth” was criticized. (See 1 Pet 21-25) Read the Christian Greek scriptures (New Testament) and see for yourself.

This may be good advice for some. I have kept enough close contacts with JWs to know that it is still not possible to return to the organization (currently) without recanting what I conscientously believe is the Bible’s view of the 1914 doctrine. There are some who have left whom I would encourage to try to rejoin the organization if it is the only way they can fulfill their obligations of love and care for their family and those still related to them in the faith.

But Jehovah knows our hearts, and he knows those who love him. He also knows our conscience, and willfully going against one’s conscience is sinful in itself according to Paul’s letter to the Romans. I would love to associate more closely with the brothers and sisters I care so much about. I would love to be closer with members of my own family. But in difficult times and in difficult circumstances we can be removed from the congregation and people can try to make one feel unloved. But no one can separate us from God’s love which is in Jesus Christ.

I guess the theme of what I hope to convey here is what is found in 1 Timothy 1:5:

  Really, the objective of this instruction is love out of a clean heart and out of a good conscience and out of faith without hypocrisy.

JWINSIDER #001: ALL aspects of 1914 doctrine are now problematic from a Scriptural point of view

This site now has permission to reprint various postings and articles from JWFacts, JWStudies, JWInsider, and several others. We are still working on getting more content from still other posters, bloggers, and site creators, and are especially looking for JWs who have taken up the same studies about chronology that we focus on here.
JWFacts has contributed articles found throughout the site, and several of the contributions from JWStudies are also found in various places on this site. The following series of articles presented below have been culled from JWInsider’s postings about 1914 from jw-archive.org and theworldnewsmedia.org.  JWInsider presents himself as a JW who remains in good standing with his congregation. While we do not always agree with the views of JWInsider, his perspective usually reflects a fair consideration of both the scriptural sources and Watchtower sources.
Note: JWInsider’s posts are often lengthy, and we have been given permission to edit them down, fix typos, etc., but have not exercised this permission yet in the posts we have decided to publish. Due to the nature of discussion forums, we are able to post only JWInsider’s side of a discussion, without the counter-arguments. With only a couple exceptions, we do not have permission to post responses from other participants in the discussion forum.

JWINSIDER #001 on 1914: From the posts in the topic ALL aspects of 1914 doctrine are now problematic from a Scriptural point of view.

The original context is found here:  https://www.theworldnewsmedia.org/topic/39516-all-aspects-of-1914-doctrine-are-now-problematic-from-a-scriptural-point-of-view/

Even before C.T.Russell was born, commentaries on Bible prophecy included  dozens of potential dates. A couple of them even included 1914 as potentially significant time, nearly 200 years ago, now. The “1914 presence” doctrine, however, is only about 75 years old.

All the ideas behind the Watch Tower’s version of the 1914 doctrine have already been discussed for decades now, and all of them, so far, have been shown to be problematic from a Scriptural point of view. Since the time that the doctrine generally took its current shape in 1943, the meanings and applications of various portions of Matthew 24 and 25 have already been changed, and the timing of various prophesied events and illustrations have changed. Most recently, the meaning and identification of the “faithful and discreet slave” has changed. And the definition of “generation” has changed about half-a-dozen times. This doesn’t mean that the current understandings are impossible, of course, only that it has become less likely from the point of view of reason and reasonableness.

Besides, for most of the years of teaching this doctrine, we have had the flexibility of extending the “1914 generation” from a possible 40 years, up to 70, then 75, then 80 years. And this has been applied to teenagers who saw 1914, 10-year-olds who saw 1914, then even newborns who saw 1914. With every one of these options already tried and stretched to their limits, we finally were forced to convert the meaning of generation from its most common meanings and give it a new “strained” meaning that has no other Biblical parallel. (See Exodus 1:6; Matthew 1:17; 16:4; 23:36; Luke 11:50)

But that flexibility is still seen as the last reason for hope that the Watch Tower Society might have still been correct in hanging on to 1914. Since the Bible says that a lifespan is 70 or 80 years and 1914 + 80 = 1994, the “generation” doctrine in its original form (1943) could remain stable until about 1994. Of course, a lifespan could technically reach to 120 years or more, and Gen 6:3 even gives vague support to the idea that the “1914 generation” could last 120 years, until 2034.

The current alternative solution is to make the generation out of the length of two lifespans, which technically could be double 120 years, or nearly 240 years from 1914. That would have had the potential to reach to the year 2154 (1914+240) except for the caveat that it can, by its new definition, only refer to anointed persons who discerned the sign in 1914 and whose lives overlapped (technically, by as little as one second) with the lifespan of another anointed person representing the second group. If persons from each group don’t really discern their own “anointing” until age 20, for example, this would effectively remove 40 years from the overall maximum. 1914+120-20+120-20 = 2114. We could also assume a possible lifespan of more than 120 years, but otherwise, the new two-lifespan generation could potentially make the generation last 200 years. This “technical maximum” is not promoted currently, because for now we look at examples like Fred Franz who was part of that original generation already anointed and who saw the sign, and the typical example of an anointed brother who was apparently “anointed” prior to Franz’ death in 1992 would be someone like Governing Body member, Brother Sanderson, who was born in 1965, baptized in 1975, and was already a “special pioneer” in 1991. His is currently 52.

However, the generation problem is just one more problem now which we can add onto the list of all the other points that make up the 1914 doctrine. Here are several points related to 1914 that appear problematic from a Scriptural point of view:

  • All evidence shows the 1914 date is wrong when trying to base it on the destruction of Jerusalem. (Daniel 1:1; 2 Chron 36:1-22; Jer 25:8-12; Zech 1:12, 7:4; Ezra 3:10-13)
  • Paul said that Jesus sat at God’s right hand in the first century and that he already began ruling as king at that time. (1 Cor 15:25)
  • Jesus said not to be fooled by the idea that wars and rumors of wars would be the start of a “sign” (Matt 24:4,5)
  • Jesus said that the “parousia” would be as visible as lightning (Matt 24:27). He spoke against people who might say he had returned but was currently not visible. (Matt 24:23-26)
  • Jesus said that his “parousia” would come as a surprise to the faithful, not that they would discern the time of the parousia decades in advance. (Matt 24:36-42)
  • Jesus said that the kingdom would not be indicated by “signs” (Luke 17:20, almost any translation except NWT in this case)
  • The “synteleia” (end of all things together) refers to a concluding event, not an extended period of time (Matt 28:20)
  • Jesus was already called ruler, King and even “King of Kings” in the first century. (1 Tim 6:15, Heb 7:2,17; Rev 1:5; 17:14)
  • Wicked, beastly King Nebuchadnezzar’s insanity and humiliation does not represent Jesus as the “lowliest one of mankind.” (Heb 1:5,6; 2:10,11; Daniel 4:23-25; cf. Heb 2:7; 1 Pet 3:17,18)
  • The demise of a Gentile kingdom cannot rightly represent the time of the rise of the Gentile kingdoms (Daniel 4:26,27)
  • The Gentile kings did not meet their demise in 1914. (Rev 2:25,26)
  • The time assigned to the Gentile Times that Jesus spoke about in Luke 21:24 is already given as 3.5 times, not 7 times (Revelation 11:2,3)
  • The Devil was already brought down from “heaven” in the first century. (1 John 2:14,15; 1 Pet 5:8; Luke 10:18; Heb 2:14)
  • The Bible says that the “last days” began in the first century. (Acts 2:14-20; 2 Tim 3:1-17; 1 Peter 3:3-5; Heb 1:2, almost any translation except NWT in this case.)

 

 

JWINSIDER #002: ALL aspects of 1914 doctrine are now problematic from a Scriptural point of view

This site now has permission to reprint various postings and articles from JWFacts, JWStudies, JWInsider, and several others. We are still working on getting more content from still other posters, bloggers, and site creators, and are especially looking for JWs who have taken up the same studies about chronology that we focus on here.

JWINSIDER #002 on 1914: From posts in the topic ALL aspects of 1914 doctrine are now problematic from a Scriptural point of view.

The original context is found here:  https://www.theworldnewsmedia.org/topic/39516-all-aspects-of-1914-doctrine-are-now-problematic-from-a-scriptural-point-of-view/

[response or question from other forum participants removed]

Yes. Partly 607, and partly the inconsistent views and inconsistencies in translation and explanations surrounding the 70 years desolation and captivities, the 70 years of Babylonian hegemony. Each of these bullet points could probably be expanded into 10 more bullet points, and a lot more scriptures than the ones listed. I’ll give just a few examples which would all be included in the first bullet point:

  1. The NWT has a fairly obvious mistranslation in Jeremiah 29:10. It has been discussed ad nauseum, but the general view from Hebrew scholars is that we have chosen the word “at” instead of “for” because the more obvious translation would lead people to notice that the verse is directly about Babylon and only indirectly about Judah. Our current doctrine requires the opposite.
  2. There was a time when the entire NWT was only translated into a dozen additional languages, and in order to say that these were actual “Bible translations” and not just translations from the English into another language, brothers in a couple countries with Biblical language skills translated directly from Hebrew. Two of these translations came out with the dreaded “for” instead of “at” and had to be changed back to match the NWT English.
  3. After many consistent denials of the validity of “for” here, the Isaiah’s Prophecy book made use of the exact same point about Babylonian hegemony in the discussion of Tyre.
  4. The Insight Book admits that Zechariah 1:12 and 7:4 must have been written almost 90 years after 607 BCE, which would be 90 years after the destruction of Jerusalem, if it had happened in 607. Ten different independent “witnesses” and literally thousands of dated contract documents all combine to provide evidence that it was only 70 years earlier that Jerusalem was destroyed, not 90. Yet, Zechariah 7:4 also indicates that it was only 70 years earlier, showing that Bible history is confirmed by archaeology. This is something that we would normally get excited about, whenever archaeology confirms the Bible record. But in this case we don’t say anything because we have a doctrine that has forced us to add 20 years to every date prior to 539, all the way back to the creation of Adam.
  5. [edited to add:] Also I had included the reference to Ezra 3 in that initial bullet point because it says that the sound of those who must have been 70-plus-year-olds (per Zechariah) wept with such a loud voice that some people couldn’t distinguish the shouts of joy from the weeping. This is far from definitive, but in the Watchtower’s theory of events, this would have referred to the sound of the 90-plus-year-olds. If we accept the history from Zechariah 1 & 7, they would have been within the range of the expected life-span, 70-plus.(Psalm 90:10) . . .The span of our life is 70 years, Or 80 if one is especially strong.. . .(Ezra 3:12,13) Many of the priests, the Levites, and the heads of the paternal houses—the old men who had seen the former house—wept with a loud voice when they saw the foundation of this house being laid, while many others shouted joyfully at the top of their voice. 13 So the people could not distinguish the sound of the joyful shouts from the sound of the weeping, for the people were shouting so loudly that the sound was heard from a great distance.

100 Years Ago: Presidential Debates – Watchtower Style

The Watch Tower Society found that debates were a fairly good way of “marketing” so that this very small religious group could make a big splash.

Russell, as president of the Watch Tower Society, had gained attention especially through the Eaton-Russell debate in 1903 and then White-Russell debate in 1908. He said that he believed the Lord’s providence had opened up the way for those two debates.

So why did Russell put the report about about the Rutherford-Troy debate in the very back as the last article of the May 1, 1915 Watch Tower? And, more importantly, why was the first article in this same issue all about downplaying the value of debates?

Some have guessed that Russell was a bit concerned about Rutherford’s brash and bombastic style, and that it probably did not represent the same style Russell himself had carefully cultivated for the Watch Tower. Russell’s emphasis was on the “high calling” in order to be part of the exclusive “Bride of Christ” and on Christian “character development.” A truly demure “Bride of Christ” would not be found “debating.” Rutherford, on the other hand, had been an experienced political speaker (working for the campaign of William Jennings Bryan). And some would conclude that his legal background as an attorney made him a professional “arguer.”

So the argument goes that Russell was becoming leery of Rutherford’s rise to power in 1915. As Russell’s attorney, he “knew where the bodies were buried” as the expression goes. (For the record, this is just an expression. I am sure there weren’t any real scandals involving dead or buried bodies in Russell’s past. Russell’s act of sending Rose Ball to Australia a few months before she might have been called upon to testify against Russell at his divorce hearing isn’t the same thing. Nor is the fact that Rose Ball’s younger brother died while working in the same house where the claimed hanky-panky with sister, Rose, had occurred.)

Rutherford was indeed becoming much more prominent in 1915, but I don’t really think that there is direct evidence of Russell having a falling out with him, or getting too worried about his rise to power and control.

Still, the general tenor of the first article was quite negative about debates in general. Here several excerpts from the first article below. Notice how the “marketing value” of the debates is the primary concern: “valuable chiefly as entering-wedges for the newspaper work.” [I’ve highlighted some of the negatives in red, and marketing advantages in blue.]

ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF DEBATES

Although the Lord’s providence did seem to open up the way for the “Eaton-Russell Debate” and later, for the “White-Russell Debate,” and through these Debates led the way on to the publication of the Sermons in hundreds of newspapers throughout the world, nevertheless the Editor is not, and never was, much of a believer in the advantages of debating. The Debates mentioned were valuable chiefly as entering-wedges for the newspaper work. . . . a debate . . . is also an excellent method of presenting the error to the public. . . .

An audience hearing a debate have the same difficulty that a jury has when hearing the opposing attorneys discussing the merits of a case. Each speaker has certain talent and ability, and each makes a certain amount of impression. . . .

Added to this is the fact that the debates in general are in the nature of a war of words, the disputants each seeking to undo the other’s arguments and to prove his own. In such a war of words the Truth is at a disadvantage. . . . . .our opponents seem to have no restrictions nor restraints. . . .Thus our opponents always have the advantage, not because they are intellectually brighter, but because they can and do use means to bamboozle the minds of the hearers and readers. . . .

So far as the Editor is concerned, he has no desire for further debates. He does not favor debating, believing that it rarely accomplishes good and often arouses anger, malice, bitterness, etc., in both speakers and hearers. . . .

This should not be understood to mean that the Editor would never again engage in a public debate, but merely that in order to induce him to debate, his opponent would need to be a person of so great prominence as to bring the matter to the attention of everybody. Only such a consideration would be a proper offset to the wide presentation of error thus accomplished. . . .

It’s actually a bit odd that Russell spoke out against them and then said he would do it anyway if he thought the “marketing” opportunity was worth it.

Whether Russell had noticed any dangers in Rutherford methods is hard to say. Rutherford had successfully defended Russell in court through his divorce and he had worked on mitigating other scandals. It seems likely to me that Russell was backing off of the debate scene for the same reasons that he distanced himself from the booklet “Great Battle in the Ecclesiastical Heavens.” He knew that these particular debates had to be very biased, just as the “Great Battle” booklet had to be very biased.

I am proposing that Russell realized that the debate was intended as part of  Russell’s defense campaign. These debates were designed to promote some positive publicity at a time when Russell’s scandals were becoming more and more publicized. Russell knew that these debates had been set up in a biased manner to help mask the scandals. How do we know that?

THE BIASED RULES OF THE DEBATES

Rutherford’s report was, as we pointed out, the last article in the same 1915 Watchtower. Even here, Russell repeats his negative view of debates after Rutherford’s report:

[We rejoice greatly that the blessing of the Lord was so richly with our dear Brother Rutherford on the occasion of the debates referred to above. Apparently the Lord guided these debates and blessed the outcome. However, we still feel a prejudice against public debates of religious questions, and have elsewhere expressed our reasons.]

Rutherford’s report was in the form of a letter. Below are some excerpts. Notice the methods that were enacted to “bias” the debate:

DEAR BROTHER RUSSELL:–

The debates are past history now–ending last evening. Every night the auditorium was packed, with probably more turned away than got in. . . . Certainly the Lord’s favor was with us, and the prayers of the many friends were answered. . . . The friends are all happy. . . . If the debates have accomplished no other good, I feel sure they have greatly strengthened the saints here, many testifying that the striking contrast between Truth and error has given them new zeal for service.

I must tell you how the Adversary did not succeed for once. My opponent was well prepared to assault you personally. I judged so from the interviews he had given the press two days before the debate. I said nothing then, but waited my time. About three minutes before we went on the platform for the first night’s discussion I called Brother Troy, my opponent, and two of his friends and two of our friends into a side room. You will recall that we had entered into a thousand-dollar obligation, with securities, that we would refrain from personalities. I then said: “Brother Troy, I desire to be absolutely frank with you and therefore I say this to you before we go on the platform. From your interviews with the press I judge that you intend to assault Pastor Russell from the platform. Of course, you can pursue that course if you wish, but the first time you attempt it I am going to have your bond forfeited.”

His reply was, “May I not mention his name?” “No,” I said, “not one time. I signed this agreement with you to discuss the Bible, and by that contract I am going to abide, and I shall expect you to do the same.” He said, “All right; I am ready.” We went on the platform. Not once did he mention your name throughout the four nights, but it was an awfully bitter pill for him to refrain therefrom. Having prepared along that line and being taken down so suddenly he was much disturbed and labored under much stress, as I could observe, during his first argument. I am confident the Lord directed this matter, and thus saved the debate from being an occasion for personal assault upon you.

. . .

Quite a large number of cards were turned in on each night. I have not the total here just now. I received a real blessing in the whole matter and am indeed grateful to the Lord that He has been pleased to give me this opportunity to bear witness to His great Plan.

This (Sunday) afternoon at the Shrine Auditorium we had a very good public meeting. The friends say there were about 3500 in attendance, 992 of whom turned in their addresses. This afternoon my subject was, “Babylon Before the Great Court”; and I took occasion to tell the people about the assaults the ministers were making against you personally. Several preachers were in the audience, and I stated that I would be glad to furnish a printed reply to each one of such charges. Sorry we did not have the booklet ready, but we will get it to many here when it does arrive. I hope that by the time you come the people will be more anxious to hear you than ever before. I think there are still some of the Lord’s people in this place.

I must take this occasion to say that the success of the publicity for the debates and meetings following here is due to the untiring and faithful work of our dear Brother Page Noll. He made himself very agreeable to the reporters “covering” the debates, and they were favorable to us in every way they could be. A full report of each day’s debate was published by the Express and the Tribune, and I am advised that about 75,000 extra copies were mailed out each day by the newspaper company to various parts of the world. The paper printed cards and distributed them all over the city, calling the attention of the people to the fact that verbatim copies of the debate would be in certain issues of the paper; and doubtless this sold many papers. Brother Noll had gone after the matter in a systematic manner, and the Lord surely blessed his efforts and his faithfulness. If a copy of the debates comes to your notice you will see that more space is given to my argument than to my opponent’s. That is due to the fact that I spoke with much more rapidity than did my opponent. Profiting by your experience at Cincinnati, I crowded in all that I could.

I enclose a clipping from one of the morning papers, wherein you will see that at yesterday’s meeting I spoke of the booklet I am getting out answering the slanderous charges against you. Quite a number are anxious to have these pamphlets, and I hope they may be ready soon.

Never before have I realized so fully the blessed privilege the Lord’s dear children have of praying for each other. I am sure that the prayers of the dear friends throughout the world had much to do with the success of these debates. . . . Brother Woodworth suggested that there must be great interest in Heaven in this debate. The Lord be praised for it all. I am thankful indeed that He was pleased to use me to glorify His dear name in any manner. Brothers Woodworth and MacMillan sat with me on the platform as counsel, and my son was by my side to take anything quickly that I desired and to prepare the copy for me without delay. . . . The Lord arranged it all. . . .

Please express my love to all the dear Bethel family, reserving a large portion for yourself. Please continue to remember me at the Throne of Heavenly Grace.

Yours in the service of the dear Redeemer,

J. F. RUTHERFORD.

There are quite a few lines in his report that appear to sound “self-serving.” Rutherford makes a case that he “won” the debates without question. But, of course, this has been questioned since then. The actual debate is available in several places online:

http://watchtowerdocuments.org/documents/1915_Rutherford_Troy_Debate.pdf

https://archive.org/details/RutherfordTroyDebate

The Watch Tower articles quoted above can be easily found in several places online, including:

http://www.agsconsulting.com/htdbv5/zwt0216.htm

Some interesting comments about the debate are found here:

Edmond C Gruss (Apostles of Denial, p.23)

and from a poster called “Athanasius” on JWN:

Regarding the Rutherford-Troy Debate, you might find it helpful to read the entire script. Bill Cetnar made it available in TROY DEBATES RUTHERFORD (privately published). I think that you can still order a copy from:

Cetnar

Route 3 Weir Lake Road

Kunkletown, PA 18058

The late Bill Cetnar assembled the information from the Los Angeles Express which covered the debate in great detail. Bill Cetnar makes this interesting observation in the book’s forward: “At a Bethel meeting I sat next to John Adam Baeurlein a former International Director and Officer of the Watchtower Society. He mentioned he had attended the Rutherford-Troy debates. I asked him why the Society refused to debate today. He answered: ‘Because Rutherford lost his shirt in debate with Troy.‘ . . . These remarks from this old man who spent 50 years at Watchtower Headquarters were a shock to me.”

Also, we happen to have an example of the type of agreement that Rutherford would enter into to keep the opponent from mentioning any scandals that Russell was involved in. If we read it carefully, the debater could not even quote from any Watch Tower publications. Even this would have been considered too damaging. The following is a portion of one of those “bonds” that Rutherford referred to in the Watchtower. This one comes from a debate that would have happened a few years later, if Rutherford had not created these impossible terms:

From B. H. Shadduck’s Seven Thunders of Millenial Dawn, 1928 ( https://archive.org/details/ThesevenThundersOfMillennialDawn ) we find a portion of one of these agreements:

shadduckrules

If it’s hard to read it says, in part, that Dr. Shadduck would follow certain rules, such as:

  1. … furnish a bond of $500.00 as a guarantee that he will not slander Pastor Russell during the debate, or refer to any quotation contained in any periodical or book published by the International Bible Students Association and if the Rev. B. H. Shadduck shall slander Pastor Russell or refer to any quotation or book published by the IBSA he shall at once pay the sum of $500.00 to his opponents in the debate.
  1. That it be understood that to slander means: To circulate a malicious report.

Shadduck believed these rules were meant to make it impossible to frame an argument clearly. It was clearly meant to produce the kind of legal intimidation that would become part of Rutherford’s signature style.

Recent Finds: 1914 – Seeing What They WANT To See

“Recent Finds” will reprint interesting and relevant discoveries from various sites, blogs, and forums.

If you have seen content from such sources that might be of specific interest to readers of this site, please let us know by replying to any of our pages. In order to reprint a “Recent Find” here, we will need permission from either the owner of the source pages, or the author. These will not typically be direct contributions to this site, nor do those who give permission necessarily agree with the content of this site.

The following content comes from jw-archive.org and we have obtained permission to reprint the comments of two persons who offer comments on that site:

The question was:

How do they come up with 1914 when Jesus was installed king of the heaven ? I am still learning and trying to get full understanding – See more at: http://www.jw-archive.org/post/120082339793/how-do-they-come-up-with-1914-when-jesus-was#sthash.cd0Uoryx.dpuf
One respondent, who claims to have been assigned research work at Bethel, included a most interesting bit of Bible Student history with reference to Russell and the pyramid studies. The “executive summary” as provided by the poster, is as follows:
What is amazing is that by searching through the entrails of the various drainage and air passages that angled through the pyramid, it never mattered whether the length of these zigzagging passages was 3,416 inches, 3,457 inches, or 3,384.904 inches. In EVERY case they proved that 1874 or 1914 or BOTH 1874 and 1914 were correct. This was true even though the first measurement was nearly 3 feet off, and the first “corrected” measurement was 6 feet off.
The original post is repeated below in it’s entirety:
______________________________________________________
 

I was thinking about JTR’s statement about “intellectual honesty.” I suspect that every religion that has ever promoted chronology doctrines has been guilty of intellectual dishonesty. I have studied only a few, and most were related to the Millerite movement, Second Adventists, Seventh Day Adventists and the Bible Students, but not enough to actually make a definitive statement about others besides these.

I talked at length to followers of Harold Camping a few years ago when they were sure that Judgment Day would be on May 21, 2011. The night before, I started a study with one of them and showed him where his information was not Biblical. He (and his wife) were sure it would happen, but promised to continue their study if it didn’t. I followed up and he basically claimed that it must have been God’s will, some kind of a test perhaps, but that they were so close there would definitely be further revelation coming very soon. What got to me most was their inability to admit that Camping had really been wrong, and another claim that nothing like this had happened back on September 6, 1994. (Which very clearly had also happened despite their denials.)

As a former researcher, not just at Bethel, but also at my first full-time job with the Bureau of Labor Statistics, I was trained to believe in intellectual and scholastic honesty. And internally I even feel a certain aggravation that one of my own parents and several relatives who once took 1975 so seriously will now claim that it was just a few overzealous brothers who were misinterpreting what the literature was really saying.

But my experiences remind me that, even WITH training to appreciate the value of intellectual honesty, the human mind sees what it wants to see. One amazing example of this is a site that attempts to defend C.T.Russell’s honesty in “the case of the 41 extra pyramid inches.” In fact, this is the best site I’ve seen that defends Russell’s honesty in this case, and I agree with it. However, in spite of defending him, it should be very clear to an outsider that Russell and his followers still saw what they wanted to see. The problem comes from these two quotes, one in the 1903 edition of Studies in the Scriptures Vol III “Thy Kingdom Come,” and one from any edition after 1904:

*** 1897 through1903 edition: ***
“…this measurement is 3416 inches, symbolizing 3416 years…. This calculation shows A.D. 1874 as marking the beginning of the period of trouble….”

*** 1905 through 1923 edition, and reprints: ***
“We find it to be 3457 inches, symbolizing 3457 years….This calculation shows that the close of 1914 will be the beginning of the time of trouble….”

[Fuller context at the end of this post.]

This change has often been pointed to by opposers as if it shows Russell’s dishonesty, supposedly as 1914 got closer (to within a decade) and it was realized that 1874 hadn’t really been a start of a time of trouble that would culminate and finish in 1914. 1914 could no longer be seen as the END of a time of trouble they had been experiencing since 1874. I’m not saying Russell was always honest – there is plenty of evidence that he was not always honest – but in this case it really was a matter of having (sloppily) estimated a pyramid length that would bring them to the 1874 date based on some inaccurate diagrams of the pyramid. When more accurate diagrams came out, these new lengths pointed to 1914.

(But notice how in each case the measurement pointed to either one of Russell’s two most most important dates! 1874 or 1914.)

But then, Russell’s favorite loyal follower and speaking companion for conventions, Brother Morton Edgar, went to Egypt in 1909 and had it measured himself. Turns out that both measurements were way off. Here’s what Edgar said in 1929, based on the new measurements taken in 1909:

*** quote from Edgar ***
You may have noted that, in his early editions of Vol. III of
‘Studies in the Scriptures,” in the Pyramid chapter, Brother Russell
states that the length of the Descending Passage, from the junction of the Ascending Passage down to the Subterranean Chamber, is 3416 inches. But in all later editions of his third volume, since 1905, the length of this passage has been altered to the extent of 41 inches, the length now being said to be 3457 inches. Formerly the north wall of the Subterranean Chamber was said to mark the date 1874 A.D., but with the new measure of 3457 inches this date was shifted forward 41 years to 1915 A.D. No explanation is given for this change. (See, however, the short article, ‘The Great Pyramid Measurements,” on page 326 of 1st Nov., 1904, ‘Watch Tower.”)

We measured this passage in 1909, having first removed from
it all obstructing debris, we found that neither the earlier published
length of 3416 inches, nor the later published length of 3457 inches,
was correct. The true length was found to be more nearly 3385 ‘Pyramid” inches. (The exact length is 3384.904 ‘Pyramid” inches.) As will be seen, this is 31 inches less than the first of Brother Russell’s figures, and 72 inches less than his later one.

We, of course, immediately communicated with Brother Russell
the true length of the Descending Passage. At first sight it appeared as if we would require to abandon the time-measurements of this lower part of the Pyramid’s passage system, the true length being so different from what we had previously understood it to be. Yet, strange to say, instead of abandoning the time-measurements, we found that the true length of the passage established these time-measurements all the more thoroughly. Both dates, 1874 and 1914, are now seen to be indicated by the end of this Descending Passage. This indication is very exact and convincing, and goes far to establish our faith in the Great Pyramid as indeed a building of God.
—Morton Edgar’s Discourse: “THE GREAT PYRAMID— Why Was It Built? Who Built It?”
*** end of quote from Edgar ***

What is amazing is that by searching through the entrails of the various drainage and air passages that angled through the pyramid, it never mattered whether the length of these zigzagging passages was 3,416 inches, 3,457 inches, or 3,384.904 inches. In EVERY case they proved that 1874 or 1914 or BOTH 1874 and 1914 were correct. This was true even though the first measurement was nearly 3 feet off, and the first “corrected” measurement was 6 feet off.

Even so, after the exact measurement was given in 1909 the new editions didn’t update it a second time and kept repeating 3,457 inches. The books also kept a statement which had been there from the very beginning that some of these pyramid measurements were accurate to within a fraction of an inch.

———–for reference: Russell’s1905-1927, Vol III passage IN CONTEXT —-
So, then, if we measure backward down the “First Ascending Passage” to its junction with the “Entrance Passage,” we shall have a fixed date to mark upon the downward passage. This measure is 1542 inches, and indicates the year B.C. 1542, as the date at that point. Then measuring down the “Entrance Passage” from that point, to find the distance to the entrance of the “Pit,” representing the great trouble and destruction with which this age is to close, when evil will be overthrown from power, we find it to be 3457 inches, symbolizing 3457 years from the above date, B.C. 1542. This calculation shows A.D. 1915 as marking the beginning of the period of trouble; for 1542 years B.C. plus 1915 years A.D. equals 3457 years. Thus the Pyramid witnesses that the close of 1914 will be the beginning of the time of trouble such as was not since there was a nation–no, nor ever shall be afterward. And thus it will be noted that this “Witness” fully corroborates the Bible testimony on this subject, as shown by the “Parallel Dispensations” in Scripture Studies, Vol. II, Chap. VII.

[Note: Russell considered October 1914 to be the start of the Jewish year 1915.]

______________________________________________________

Thanks to the original poster at jw-archive.org who wishes to remain anonymous.

Additional notes: It may also interest our readers that the Wikipedia entry under Harold Camping, referenced above, has the following footnote:

“Harold Camping Says End did come May 21, spiritually; Predicts New Date: October 21”. International Business Times. Retrieved May 23, 2011.

The link no longer works, but the sentiment seemed eerily familiar to students interested in Russell and Rutherford’s teaching methods. Carl Sagan referred to this same “method” with reference to Russell’s predictions and Jehovah’s Witnesses.

 

Websites, Blogs, Forums, Ministries, Support, Videos

This site does not compete with existing sites that discuss issues relevant to JWs to and ex-JWs. We are focused primarily on doctrinal issues related to chronology. Of course, there are already many of those sites, too, but we hope to help make sense of which material is accurate and relevant. A lot of the best information is hard to sift from incorrect information. We hope to create a kind of consolidation or index of the best material.

And it’s not because we believe chronology doctrines are so important.On the contrary, we believe there are much more important things for JWs to be concerned with. The most serious issues are only indirectly related to doctrine. Just look at some of the other websites mentioned below to find out about JWs facing problems related to stress, fear, dishonesty, control, family relationships, child protection, uncertainty, mental health, doubt, putting too much trust in men, and hypocrisy.

We know that chronology doctrines are some of the “weakest links” in the armor that keeps JWs from seeing more serious problems. Therefore, some of these unimportant doctrinal issues might easily become an eye-opener for JWs and ex-JWs to look into the more important things, even if at the moment, they are not being recognized as problems. So while we begin to put together an “index” of the best sites about 1914 and related doctrines, we are happy to point you some of these other sites that address doctrines and array of other matters, too.

Excellent Sites for JW and ex-JW Research

These were taken (with permission) from the site ex-jw.com, copyrighted by ex-jw.com and John Hoyle.
We will be editing the list over time to focus on chronology and doctrinal research.

  • JW Survey
    Founded and edited by “Cedars,” a former JW elder from the UK. In addition to maintaining a public survey, the site publishes well-written and timely articles. The fastest growing readership among all JW discussion blogs.
  • Watchtower Observer
    Kent Steinhaug’s classic anti-Watchtower website is back! Mostly off-line since 2005, this new version resurrects Kent’s critical news articles originally published between 1998-2004. Many articles include updates. This is a classic!
  • Watchtower Watch
    Cutting edge website designed for maximum educational value. Focuses on current Watchtower publications, unique personal testimonies and educated opinions. Provides current JW news feeds. Most of the material offered can not be found anywhere else online.

Blogs

  • Governing Body Letters
    Interesting but somewhat disorganized Blogger site hosted by “Theocratic Joker.” Awkward at times to navigate, this site has a ton of WT insider information and documents. Take a look.
  • Jehovah’s Witness Reporter
    Quick and dirty Tumblr site. Short posts, lots of videos and graphics. News and announcement blog that serves as support to another (not yet announced) site that will focus on information and literature offered through JW.org.

Book Sites

  • Out of the Cocoon
    Brenda Lee’s website dedicated to anyone who has experienced abuse, alcoholism, depression, or a parent’s rejection due to being raised in a cult. Lot’s of supporting material and ordering information. Her book has become a classic.
  • Richard E. Kelly
    Personal site of the author of “Growing Up in Mama’s Club- a Childhood Perspective of Jehovah’s Witnesses,” his memoir of growing up in a Jehovah’s Witness family. Site includes additional background and ordering information.
  • Watchtower Books Store
    This site is a retailer for mostly out of print Watchtower Society publications. Claims to be the largest online store offering original materials including Watchtower, Awake!, Golden Age and Consolation magazines. Some items can be pricey.

Documents & History

  • Jehovah’s Witnesses Exposed
    Located in a subdirectory of this Canadian based website, this somewhat dated resource is full of interesting historical perspectives of JW teachings and scandals. Well worth a visit…
  • Truth Before Lies
    This site is still being updated. Good intentions to be encouraged. Offers links to very valuable documentation, PDF version of older Watchtower publications, and other resources. Give this one a long and close look. See also JW Media Films (above).
  • Watchtower Documents LLC
    You want proof? Barbara Anderson’s got plenty of proof. Spend hours viewing copies of actual documents, newspaper clippings, and old Watchtower publications. Great site for writers, researchers, and those who just have to prove the facts to themselves!

Ex-JW Information

  • Doc Bob’s Jehovah’s Witness Website
    “Doc” Bob, a former JW pioneer and elder, left after 22 years when he found things about the Watchtower to be troublesome. He realized that JWs were not spiritual but organizational. Good site to rummage around in for odd new fact or two.
  • JW Struggle
    A well-designed and informative blog with a good selection of videos, personal stories, and critiques of Watchtower history, policy, and beliefs.
  • JWFacts.com – Facts About Jehovah’s Witnesses
    Paul Grundy’s Australian based site. Contains a broad range of information, both from historical and theological viewpoints. Site design is a little overwhelming and outdated, but well worth the time and effort to visit and learn.
  • Six Screens of the Watchtower
    A unique site with moderated free weekend conference calls exposing Watchtower secrets and lies. Rick Fearon has turned this site into a multimedia extravaganza that provides a wide range of personal testimony.

Forums & Support Groups

  • Advocates for Awareness of Watchtower Abuses (AAWA.co)
    AAWA was formed in March 2013 as a resource for activists speaking out against harmful Watchtower policies. Provides news and personal stories. Good resource for videos, flyers, and handouts. Has a Forum with an active team of dedicated volunteers.
  • Channel C
    Channel C maintains a somewhat restricted membership and focused discussions. Good site for lurking and for general reading. Excellent panel of some prominent former JWs. Site administrator will accept submitted questions for panel discussions.
  • Ex-Jehovah’s Witness Forum and Recovery Site
    A very open forum with a broad range of defined categories. This forum can be a lot of fun to browse through and membership is open to almost anyone with some connection to the JWs. Most forum members are well informed with a sense of humor.
  • Jehovah’s Witness Recovery
    Website and forum that provides a generally positive and encouraging environment for former Jehovah’s Witnesses, to help their transition from the organization into normal society.
  • Jehovah’s Witness Discussion Forum
    The largest ex-JW Internet forum. Originally a discussion board for Jehovah’s Witnesses, it morphed into the central gathering place for ex-JWs, unhappy Witnesses, and other contributors. Experiencing some technical problems (June, 2009).
  • JW Match
    Commercial dating site for single Jehovah’s Witnesses in the USA. Looking for a red hot date with a “lover of Jehovah”? Not sure if this should be in the “Pro-Watchtower” or “Scandals & Secrets” categories…

General Information and News

  • Jehovah’s Witness Report
    Newly created, this site is still under development. It’s designed to be a “news aggregation” site much like Huffington Post, somewhat like Watchtower Observer was from 1998-2004. Expected to be fully operational by Summer 2014.

Personal Testimonies

  • Atheist Geek News
    The “Geek” isn’t spreading atheism, nor being overly critical of Jehovah’s Witnesses. Definitely not a “hate the Watchtower” or a “become an atheist” site. A very insightful and entertaining blog with a slightly off-center approach to its subjects…

Pro-Watchtower

  • Jehovah’s Witnesses – Official Media Web Site
    Official media outlet from the Watchtower organization. Presents a very limited and sanitized view of the WT and its beliefs. Generic and unexciting….
  • Worldwide Association of Jehovah’s Witnesses
    An official Watchtower website providing MP3 and AAC audio versions of recent Watchtower and Awake! magazine articles. Also audio versions of recent Yearbook and other study books. Provides a look-up for upcoming convention dates and locations…

Scandals & Secrets

  • Associated Jehovah’s Witnesses for Reform on Blood
    A new version of the site is coming online soon [Spring 2014]. Provides hard to find information about the Watchtower’s ever changing position on blood and transfusion therapy. You will be amazed at the number of doctrinal changes on this subject.
  • Silent Lambs
    Supportive, yet gutsy site dedicated to tell the background stories of the many cases of child abuse within the Watchtower organization. This site is worth your time and your support…
  • Watchtower Lies
    Well presented French and English language website that clearly presents most of the scandals and questionable practices connected to the Watchtower Society…

Video & Audio Sites

  • Cult Free Radio (UStream)
    “MadSweeney’s” bi-weekly podcast discussing how to combat the influence of cults (like Jehovah’s Witnesses) and lead confused and misguided followers to personal freedom. Includes audio recordings of past broadcasts…
  • JW Media Films
    A relatively new video site connected to the website www.TruthBeforeLies.com. Excellent and well constructed videos with strong preparation and documentation. Ranks among the very best video sites. Spend some time checking this one out.
  • Watchtower Comments
    A great collection of high quality informative videos about Jehovah’s Witnesses and the Watchtower Society. Produced by an active JW, this site tries to be very even handed and informative. See website for direct YouTube link.

Who Was Thomas Emlyn?

The Watchtower writers didn’t intend for ex-Witnesses to see the close parallels between their own experience and that of Thomas Emlyn. But that’s not the only reason we include a reference to this recent article. It should also help JWs think twice before complaining that a site such as this one is tantamount to “hero worship.”

Although Emlyn’s specific doctrinal issues might be different than ours, the April 1, 2014 Watchtower celebrates his life because he took a stand for truth and suffered the consequences. The article says that the outcome of his trial was obviously influenced by seven bishops of the Church of Ireland. But he stood up to their scorn, suffering a year in prison and the charge of blasphemy.

Similarly we include the experiences of  many people who, like Thomas Emlyn, have stood up for truth and suffered the consequences due to the treatment by the leadership of the Watch Tower Society and other Jehovah’s Witnesses.

Although Emlyn’s issue was with the Trinity doctrine, those who researched the 1914 or related teachings have often experienced amazing parallels to this story. Some excerpts from the Watchtower article are included below:

During those times, Emlyn was carefully studying the Bible. … As he researched the Gospels, he became convinced that they supported his improved understanding.

The Watchtower often reserves the phrase “careful study of the Bible” for those interested in studying the Bible with Witnesses, in the context of conversion, baptism, and making use of the study aids provided by the “faithful slave.” But what was the attitude of Watch Tower leadership when that careful study of the Bible would convince someone of an improved understanding. Read Randy Watters experience and you might be surprised to see how member of the Governing Body responded: “Stay away from deep Bible study to determine meanings of the scriptures.”

Emlyn did not immediately reveal what he had found. However, some in his Dublin church noticed that he did not refer to [the doctrine] in his sermons.

This is common to several of the experiences. Note that Ron Frye, who had been a Circuit Overseer, spent nearly a decade reevaluating the doctrines before leaving. Naturally, these issues can never be heard in your public talks.

..[H]oping to vindicate his views, he published [a book] An Humble Inquiry Into the Scripture-Account of Jesus Christ. In this publication, he gave clear Scriptural proof…. This infuriated members of Emlyn’s former congregation in Dublin. A formal complaint was filed.

When a Witness leaves and writes a book, this is considered one of the most heinous forms of apostasy. The writing is immediately deemed “evil” or “poisonous.” The Watchtower has likened such books to “pornography.” And even knowing that someone could collect information about them that might be publicized negatively is fear-inspiring to them. Note the reaction of the “Judicial Committee” in Poul Bregninge’s experience when he told them he had a tape recorder.

Emlyn was arrested …in Dublin on June 14, 1703. …The trial proved to be a farce. Seven bishops of the Church of Ireland sat on the bench with the judges. Emlyn was not allowed to speak in his own defense. Richard Levins, a distinguished lawyer, told Emlyn that he would be run down “like a wolf, without law or game.” …

This was the climate in Brooklyn Bethel when Nestor and Toni Kuilan were “arrested.” Nestor was told that if he ever wanted to be re-instated he would have to go through the Governing Body. The Governing Body worked behind the scenes to make sure the final judgments were to their liking. This is well known in the case of Ray Franz, who also details, in his books, some of the unchristian judicial methods the Watch Tower leadership engaged in during the cases of  Edward Dunlap, Cris and Norma Sanchez and many others. And this is validated again by the experiences  contributed here by Randy Watters and Nestor Kuilan.

When Emlyn was found guilty, the solicitor-general proposed that he retract. Emlyn refused. He was fined and sentenced to a year’s imprisonment. …

This actually sounds mild compared to the way Peter Gregerson puts it: “he also knew that leaving the Watchtower, after nearly fifty years of loyalty, would not be easy. His wife and her family, his children, …and… closest friends were all Witnesses. And in their eyes, to leave the Watchtower is to turn one’s back on Jehovah himself, and to be essentially given a death sentence. If a person is disfellowshipped, other members are no longer allowed to speak with that “wicked” person.”

Emlyn moved to London, where he eventually associated with William Whiston, another Bible scholar who had been ostracized because he published what he felt was Bible truth. …

Compare this attitude with the fact that Jehovah’s Witnesses are trained to be prejudiced against those who associate themselves with non-Witnesses. We have included the contributions of some, like Joan Cetnar, who have found solace and spiritual fulfillment through other religious organizations and ministries. And, of course, others have found this same fulfillment without any need for organizations of any kind.

The example set by Emlyn and others can move us to consider whether we are willing to stand up for the truth in the face of scorn. We too can ask ourselves, ‘Which is more important—the honor and blessing of the community or upholding the truth of God’s Word?’

Clearly this article in the Watchtower is one of many examples that hits very close to home for many who happily worked and served among Jehovah’s Witnesses for years, or even decades. We celebrate how they have made the proper choice dictated by conscience: “standing up for truth in the face of scorn.” But we won’t scorn them.

 

What is a Generation? Alex.

I’ll have 10 letter words for $800, Alex.

“A COHORT OF CONTEMPORARIES; AS A TIME SPAN IT’S OFTEN GIVEN AS 30 YEARS.”

“What is a Generation?” was the correct response that earned Sandie $800 in the Jeopardy game that aired on April 15, 2014. (Season 30, Episode 75)

That question aired on Jeopardy earlier today (as of this writing). But I was already thinking about that same question since yesterday evening. That’s because yesterday was the Memorial (as celebrated by JWs) and I had just attended in a rented banquet hall, where a wedding reception and a Sweet Sixteen birthday party had just occurred the day before.

It’s not common for the person giving the Memorial talk to mention either the date 1914 or 1935 anymore, and this speaker didn’t mention them either. The idea of the “this generation” was only mentioned in a very general way during the speaker’s conclusion and he happened to use the term in his closing prayer.  Yet, I happen to know that it was already on the minds of more than one person in the audience.  I know that because I spoke with one attendee just a few days prior to the Memorial on that very subject.

But mostly I know it because there was an awkward moment of excessive whispering at one point during the passing of the Memorial emblems that became a topic of discussion immediately after the closing prayer, even before I could make our way  to the aisle.

Here’s how it started.

The audience of at least 350 was made up of 2 congregations who rented the banquet hall. The speaker was a relatively young elder, probably about 40 years old, from one of the two congregations. Out of the 350, there was nary a nibble or a sip taken from any of the emblems.

But there was one exception. And it was done in such a way that no one could miss it.  It wasn’t so obvious with bread, but very obvious with the wine. There was a little table that started out with 6 glasses, all filled to the half-way point, to the exact same point. After the 6 servers completed the task of passing the wine across all the rows they brought the glasses back to the little table and it they were all still filled perfectly to the midpoint. No sips, no slips, no mishaps.

The servers sat down just off to the left of the stage facing toward the audience, and the speaker very ceremoniously walks 20 feet to that table, picks up a glass of wine and then over to the servers to offer it to each one of them. No takers. Then he walks back to the table, replaces it, and walks 20 feet back to the podium. Then in a move that looked like a mistake at first,  one of the servers gets up and in a deliberate slow-motion stride, picks up the same glass of wine that the speaker had just put down, and he walks 20 feet over to the speaker’s podium and offers it to the speaker. And the little boy next to explains to his sister in a whisper, “Oh yeah, they have to give it to him too.” I was thinking that it might be clever to whisper: “The rite of last refusal.” But, of course, I didn’t, and I made a mental note to look up exactly what the original phrase, “right of first refusal” means in contract or real estate law.

It surprised me to see the 40-year elder partake. And, judging by all the young whisperers and subsequent parental hushing, it surprised a lot of others, too. The same boy next to me asked “Why is he drinking it, Daddy?” There was even a “hmm?” and a barely audible mumble from the brother sitting to my right. And one of the two sisters right behind me whispered something like “That’s right.” showing that she (or they) already knew that he would partake.

There was a time when elderly visitors from Brooklyn Bethel were often invited to congregations to give the Memorial talk, and it was fairly common to see him partake. It’s often why they were invited. As a Bethelite, assigned to a Bronx congregation, I was more than once asked if I knew of any partakers who could be invited to give the Memorial talk in our congregation. Back then, the only other person who partook was a sister who, for reasons I won’t go into here,  no one wanted to believe was really “one of the anointed.”

Meanwhile, back at yesterday’s Memorial: After the closing prayer, and before I could manage to squeeze toward an aisle (about 20 tightly packed folding chairs in either direction).  I overheard a brother from the first row answering a question about the “age of the anointed generation.” From what I could tell, I think he was answering it wrong, from the current JW perspective,  but it was none of my business.  The idea behind the question had been recently brought up in a Watchtower magazine that  had just been studied a couple weeks ago. From the time of that magazine, the question had also been recently addressed to me personally in an online discussion forum that I participate in, from time to time.

The question arises because the Watchtower had created a direct connection between the “anointed” and the meaning of “this generation.”  And this person, because he was a relatively young elder, clearly begged the question, based on the Watchtower‘s specific comments. Along with repeating the new long-winded definition of “this generation,” the January 15, 2014 Watchtower said:

We understand that in mentioning “this generation,” Jesus was referring to two groups of anointed Christians. ,. . .[yet] not every anointed person today is included in “this generation” of whom Jesus spoke.”

The simple Jeopardy clue, above, highlighted to me just how ridiculously the Watchtower had twisted and stretched the natural meaning of a term like “this generation.” In the original context of Matthew and Luke, it appeared that it could refer to the time between 33 CE when Jesus made the statement, and 68 to 70 CE when Jerusalem was surrounded by encamped armies.  About 37 years passed  people of “that generation” might see “all these things occur.” (Matt 24, Mark 10, Luke 17 & 21) So a generation of 40 years might easily match what Jesus had in mind.

Another definition of generation — likely the one implicit in the Jeopardy clue —  is the span of time from a person’s birth to the time period when their own children are born, usually 25 to 35 years later, and then again from the time of those children to the time period when the grandchildren are born, and then on to the great-grandchildren, etc. These “generation” periods might average about 30 years each.

In other words, using a common definition of generation, we’ve already had 3 or 4 since 1914, and could easily squeeze in one or two, or even three more before the Watchtower‘s legalese-laden definition runs out.  For the Watchtower, “this generation” equals 3 to 6  “unstretched” generations.

In fact, if the Jeopardy question had been specifically about the current meaning of “this generation” to JWs, the clue would have to be changed. It would need to look more like this:


REFERS TO TWO GROUPS OF ANOINTED CHRISTIANS; THE FIRST GROUP WHO WERE ON HAND IN 1914, AND WHO READILY DISCERNED THE  SIGN OF CHRIST’S PRESENCE IN THAT YEAR, AND WHO WERE NOT ONLY ALIVE IN 1914, BUT WHO WERE ALREADY SPIRIT ANOINTED AS SONS OF GOD IN OR BEFORE THE YEAR 1914; AND THE SECOND GROUP WHO ARE ANOINTED CONTEMPORARIES OF THE FIRST GROUP, WHO WERE NOT SIMPLY ALIVE DURING THE LIFETIME OF THOSE IN THE FIRST GROUP, BUT WHO WERE ALSO ALREADY ANOINTED DURING AT LEAST PART OF OF THE TIME THAT THOSE IN THE FIRST GROUP WERE STILL ALIVE ON EARTH

Seems to me this generation might just run out by the time Alex Trebek could finish reading the clue.

It’s a question I have seen a few times online, twice directed toward me personally in the last couple of weeks, one of which I answered on my Facebook page. (See below.) The exact question, as it was put to me by a Witness, went like this: (She quoted verbatim from the January 15, 2014 Watchtower)

March 29th, 7:11am

In his detailed prophecy about the conclusion of this system of things, Jesus said: “This generation will by no means pass away until all these things happen.” (Read Matthew 24:33-35.) We understand that in mentioning “this generation,” Jesus was referring to two groups of anointed Christians. The first group was on hand in 1914, and they readily discerned the sign of Christ’s presence in that year. Those who made up this group were not merely alive in 1914, but they were spirit-anointed as sons of God in or before that year.—Rom. 8:14-17. 16 The second group included in “this generation” are anointed contemporaries of the first group. They were not simply alive during the lifetime of those in the first group, but they were anointed with holy spirit during the time that those of the first group were still on earth. Thus, not every anointed person today is included in “this generation” of whom Jesus spoke. Today, those in this second group are themselves advancing in years. Yet, Jesus’ words at Matthew 24:34 give us confidence that at least some of “this generation will by no means pass away” before seeing the start of the great tribulation. This should add to our conviction that little time remains before the King of God’s Kingdom acts to destroy the wicked and usher in a righteous new world.—2 Pet. 3:13.

March 29th, 7:12am

My question is, Do you know who among them (second group) still alive? And their specific age? I plan to include that in my comment in the watchtower study next week. Hope you can help me. Thanks- sister [name removed]

March 30th, 9:27pm [my response]

I have seen this same question come quite a few times, lately. I get the sense that some people ask the question as a means of trying to figure out just how long — at most — this system can last. But from a purely Christian standpoint, that can be a dangerous proposition. First, we can agree that the end can come at any time, and that no matter when that is, even many true Christians will be surprised. That day will come as a thief in the night. And it can be just as big a problem when we believe that we can identify the most distant point in the future when the end is expected. What will happen if, for some reason, our understanding even among Jehovah’s Witnesses, turned out to be mistaken? If shared, this could produce a stumbling block for other Witnesses and outsiders who might otherwise have shown interest and goodwill. I’m sure you understand that but I wouldn’t feel comfortable without mentioning it first.

The first thing you’d want to look for are any possible examples from the first group described. Remember that “The first group was on hand in 1914, and they readily discerned the sign of Christ’s presence in that year.” Unfortunately, it turns out that we don’t really know even one person who met that test in its most accurate sense. Technically, anyone associated with the Watchtower Society at that time (in 1914) still believed that the last days had started in 1799, and that Jesus’ presence had begun invisibly in 1874. 1914 was to be seen as the end of Christ’s invisible presence, a time when Bible Students (as we were called then) would now see Jesus face to face, visibly. There was no specific “sign” of Christ’s presence to discern that year, because no sign would be needed to see Jesus in person. This teaching remained until around 1930 and parts of it were not officially changed until 1943. So what the Watchtower means is that there were people who saw the “sign” of Jesus’ presence in 1914 even though they did NOT readily discern anything that was true or correct about it. We can assume at least, that the Watchtower means anyone who recognized ANY significance to World War I would be in that intended group. One person in that intended group, therefore, would have been Charles Taze Russell. He saw a significance to the Great War in 1914 (even if he gave it a false significance) and he then died in 1916. So he would be one of the first that would most likely meet the intention of the contemporary generations of anointed. Any who were anointed contemporaries of him are therefore a part of that second generation of anointed. We expect that would include persons like Joseph Rutherford and Frederick Franz. Therefore, some persons who are part of that second generation of anointed contemporaries have already died. (1942 and 1992, respectively.) However, to pick an ideal example of a person many might recognize as anointed who was also part of that first generation we could, again, pick Frederick W Franz. He was alive in 1914 and old enough to recognize it as a significant event during Jesus’ presence (even if not readily discerned for what it was, based on their current understanding of Christ’s presence). Franz began his association with the Watchtower Society around 1914. So now we have someone of the first generation who lived until 1992. Any anointed persons who were contemporaries with him would therefore also be part of that second generation. Therefore even a person who became one of these anointed as late as 1992 could technically be part of this second defined group of anointed. No one can specifically say if another person is anointed, however, it is true that the youngest member of the Governing Body (Brother Sanderson, who would now be 49), for example, was born in 1965, and could therefore be seen as fitting this situation — if we assume he was “of the anointed” between 1965 and 1992, using this case. Although interesting, I still think it’s a bad idea to publicize such information in the context of the generation Jesus spoke about. There is still a danger that persons could take such an example, and think it’s the same as saying that the system could potentially last until 2055, if the example (Sanderson) lives to be 90, or as late as 2085, if he lives to be 120. I know this might seem absurd to you, but it’s how a lot of persons tend to think. Hope this helps. And I hope you understand why my answer is probably a bit longer than you might have expected.

March 31st, 4:06am

Thank you so much for your help. Jah bless u.

very kind and informative answer. it really feed my mind. Thanks

March 31st, 10:39am

No problem. It’s an interesting question. Hope all is OK with you and your friends and congregation

[Note: above was slightly edited to avoid identifying participants, etc.]